My gp referred me for birth trauma counselling, and said that I was going to see a specialist MW counsellor at the hospital, who would go through the labour notes and listen to me about the panic attacks and anxieties I have had since having ds. (10 months old, has developmental delays, under investigation, born by elcs, in scbu for 8 days due to lung problems which consultant at the time said was because he must have been more prem than 39 weeks)
When I went in I was rather taken aback to find the consultant who had agreed my section, the surgeon who performed it and MW who i saw antenatally at the hospital. She went through the notes on the section, and said that as far as she was concerned ds was definitely term, the section had been uncomplicated (despite the fact I lost huge amounts of blood, had very low blood pressure throughout and had a terrible recovery). She said that she thought that rather than ds's problems being the result of being prem, that his problems were the cause of his lung issues at birth. She spent most of the time saying she wished she could get me to talk to women trying to get a section, so that they could hear how traumatic it can be, although she said that had ds been a vaginal birth his lung problems may have been worse.
I felt relieved to hear that ds's problems may not have been the fault of me having a section (i had to fight to get one, and then wished i hadn't had one), but felt completely confused by the whole thing. I thought that it must have been a strange coincidence they were all there, but when I came home and told dh, he seemed to think it was a bit strange and wondered if they were in trying to cover their arses.
I don't really know what to think.