Had my first daughter by em c-s due to failure to progress, and had to have a GA as my epidural hadn't worked either!
I met with the consultants and we had a very frank conversation about VBAC cs ELCS. I really really wanted to have a VBAC, though, as I had great difficulty in coming to terms with my c-s amd felt like I had failed. The cons waited for me to express my preference then said 'Good! I can see no reason why you shuldn't have a successful VBAC!' DD1 was a brow presentation, hence the failure to progress. The cons said they would have gone with an ELCS if I was adamant that was what I wanted, but she really felt I could have a vaginal birth.
The hospital were very helpful, and the mw helped me write a birthplan which stated that I wanted to try for a VAC, but did not want to have synto (as I had found it very difficult to cope with the pain with synto when my epidural wasn't working). So, the plan was, trial of labour, then straight to CS if any intervention was needed.
In the event, I was labouring with DD2, and struggling a bit. A very lovely obstetrician came in and persuaded me to have an epidural (which I didn't want) as she would need it in place for a CS anyway. I gave birth to DD2 vaginally a couple of hours later - the epi gave me the respite I needed to get through the last bit.
I think the key for me was that the medical staff listened to me all the way through - I was never made to feel pressurised to jump one way or the other. I could have changed my mind at any time, though the drawback was that, with an ELCS, the theatre and staff would have been ready for me when scheduled, which clearly they couldn't be if it was an em c-s. I felt they did actually have my interests and those of my baby at heart. The recovery time was much quicker (despite a second degree tear) and I was home much faster (which was a bonus, as DD1 was only 2, and I missed her).
I went on to have an induced VBAC with DD3 2.5 years later, BTW, and it was by far the best of my three births - despite what you might expect!