I had an emcs with DS as I had slow progress (meconium in waters so was being monitored etc.), and I failed to dilate further than 9 cms - when I tried pushing DS went into distress.
Now DD is due in March, and I've just had an appt with the birth options team. My community midwife's opinion is to have another cs as I am very small and she just feels its the best option for me, bearing in mind she has seen me through both pregnancies, palpated me, did my sweep with DS etc. She thinks there is a chance of the same problem recurring as there's no way of knowing if the shape of my pelvis had anything to do with it. DS was in the perfect position prior to labour and turned back to back during labour. I should point out that she did go through the VBAC option with me and said she would support whatever I decided, she wasn't negative about it at all.
The birth options midwife said there is no reason why I can't go for a VBAC, and that they would encourage me to do so. I mentioned what my midwife had said with regards to the possibility of the same problem and she just shook her head at me (she was a bit patronising actually!) and said that that was wrong.
My community midwife is as qualified as the birth options midwife - and yet they are completely contradicting each other, and it's made me a bit cross. TBH I am still leaning towards an elcs. I had issues bonding with DS after the traumatic birth and I don't want DD's birth to go down the same route. I also don't want to be coerced into a VBAC because it's hospital policy to encourage them, rather than it being the right thing for me and the baby. I don't like the idea either that I will be under pressure to 'perform' to a certain timescale to prevent another emcs. But how can I make an informed opinion when the two HCPs I've seen have totally different viewpoints??
Aaargh. WWYD??