Bit of back ground- I am 38 and only 4ft 8 (this is relevant, honest!).
I am on dc3- dd2 due October 4th. Ds (now 7) was a vb, at 41+1, but he was only 6lb 1. Dd (4 next week!) was delivered by emcs , after a 32 hour induced labour. She was stuck, she was never coming out. It was quite badly managed, dd was born with a facial palsy due to her position, and it took age to recover for me, after effectively going through both types of labour. She was 8lb 2, and I had had a bad pregnancy. Again it was at 41+1. i felt pretty beaten up after the experience, and it took me weeks to recover.
This time round,am now 31 week, far bigger than last time, and really struggling. I have spd, which doesn't help. Today i had a review app and a scan, and baby is big (for me) i am dreading going over again, as I feel so ill, but really wanted to avoid a section. All signs point to this being the best option all round, and they will decide at 37 weeks to do a cs at 39 weeks. I suppose what this ramble is wanting to know, is to those who have done both, is is easier to recover when the cs is planned? Is it a vastly different experience to an emcs? (in termsof how you are physically, and recovery). I suppose part of me feels guilty about now deciding not to go for a vbac.
But it's not a competition, is it? So long as dd2 is born healthy? Think i am feeling a bit bombarded by info today
Thank you if you have read this far....