@yosemite78 I wish I could give legal advice. I can't. I wish I could reach out to you and your DS. Also wish I could reach the family court who decided a little boy should be made to spend time with the man who sexually abused him.
Sometimes, somebody needs to cordially shake some judges by the neck.
Having his mummy present during the ordeal might stop further physical assault, but it gives the message that mummy is in some way agreeing it is o.k. for him to be with a paedophile.
The child is not mentally ill. The child is being forced by a deranged legal system to be face to face with his assailant.
There must be some way to bring this back to court with proper representation. The court seems to have taken the view that a sexual assault could not have happened, because it wasn't proved in court to have happened.
Well, it did happen. Your child could not have given much more proof than his sexualised behaviour, his fears, his distress, and for heaven's sake his actual disclosure.
Just in case there was room for doubt (and there wasn't) the way the child is behaving after forcibly meeting the assailant is exactly a textbook double proof. He was telling the truth. Of course he was. Small children do tell the truth about sexual abuse.
Can you get in touch with child abuse organisations? You need help to refuse to let the assailant near your child again because it is court-ordered child abuse.
If anyone was forced to sit with a person who had sexually abused them, they would not understand a world where they were so unprotected, and their assailant so abetted. They would not be mad. They would be extremely distressed and bewildered, their safety in the world taken away, even their own mother knowing about it and yet allowing it.
Really this repeat of the original distressed behaviour is new evidence. It is evidence for court. Not evidence to have your son branded mentally deranged.
It would be grounds to justify suspending compliance with the misguided court order, until such time as proper representation at a court can be made.
Everyone would normally have to obey court, but it is clearly unreasonable for you to collude with secondary re-triggering abuse of your own child, by forced contact with his paedophile assailant.
I wish I knew the best organisations to help you, but there's childline and any of the children's charities, and there are possibly sources of information on N.A.P.A.C. and Havoca, who specialise in all the adults who were abused as children.
Family courts should not be secret. Their customers could be strictly anonymous but the judges should have bright light on them.
Can you imagine if the papers were reporting a child being ordered to visit one of the famous paedophiles?
Well, just as the great majority of adult rapists are known to the victim, so the great majority of paedophiles practice on their own children.
Your dc was abused from infancy, not by someone called Jimmy Savill, but by someone called 'daddy'.
I just thought of one good thing about Covid19. You could use it to dodge out of contact, and so to buy time while you get legal backing to suspend contact and get the order overturned. The next meeting date might be just when either you or your son had a covid scare and needed to isolate.
Sorry, I was so shocked on your son's behalf, I neglected your point of view. The mothers here will share horror at how it is for you yourself to be ordered to see the man who did that to your child, let alone to be ordered to force the child to see him too.