My DH is 46 and has a diagnosis of terminal bowel cancer (Metastatic adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid). Cancer is present in his bowel, liver and both lungs, and (as of a couple of months ago) one of his lymph nodes. He is almost 20 months on from diagnosis / 18 months since treatment started, with an initial prediction of 2-3 years to live, and we are now coming up to year 2.
Ever since diagnosis we have been told that surgery is not an option for him - initially they said because the tumour in his bowel was too big, but even after chemo, when it had shrunk right down, they still said no to surgery. He has never been offered the opportunity to see a liver specialist, which according to the Bowel Cancer UK website he should have been (something I only discovered last week). His primary tumour has now grown back so much it blocked his bowel so he has a stoma.
I've asked his Oncologist multiple times about surgery, from the beginning, and been told it's not an option, but I don't understand why.
Can someone explain to me why he couldn't have surgery. Why can't they remove the tumours - or least, when they had all shrunk to their smallest size thanks to chemo, at that point why couldn't they have been removed? At one point the bowel tumour shrank down so far it was barely there, why couldn't that section of bowel then be removed? Because it has since grown all the way back.
I realise the tumours in his lungs present an added difficulty but they have always been tiny. If the other tumours had been removed would that have lessened the chance of it spreading to his lymph nodes?
And if he had surgery could he have been a candidate for the Personalised Cancer Vaccine trials which are happening at the moment to stop the tumours coming back?
He has been on Irinotecan and Cetuximab, then Folfox, and then Lonsurf - the Lonsurf has made him so ill he's had to stop taking it, leaving him with few options now.
Is there anything, anything at all that can possibly be done at this point? Because I keep reading and hearing about people having different outcomes according to the medical professionals they get, and that outcomes are different as a result. Should we ask for a second opinion, and if so where should we go? Or is it too late? We trust implicitly in the wisdom of the Oncologist we are given, but should we? I don't know.
If anyone can advise, please please take a moment to reply. Thank you so much.