Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Calorie-counting

Discuss calorie counting, including tips, challenges and real-life experiences. Mumsnet hasn't checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. You may wish to speak to a medical professional before starting any diet.

Fat-logic by Nadja Hermann - anyone read it? What are your thoughts?

7 replies

aniawl · 14/01/2019 12:09

A couple of weeks ago I came across an article by Nadja Hermann on the guardian website bringing a few excerpts from her new book - The Fat logic. They resonated with me and I bought the book. I’ve since read it and found it really refreshing in her approach to dispelling of the 1001 weight loss theories with meticulous research and just driving home the simple truths that I’ve trained my brain to ignore for years. None of it was rocket science but somehow it hit hard. I’d recommend it if you need a kick up the bum to get started / keep going ( although I’d say she could fit the book in half the pages - once I went past the half way mark there didn’t seem to be much new info)

The gist of the book is this :

  • whether a person puts on weight or not is a zero-sum of whether the amount of energy one puts into one’s body is the greater or lesser than what we need.
  • she dispenses of the myth of slow metabolism( lots of scientific sources backing her up there)
  • all diets are just a shortcut - a method of effectively consuming fewer calories ( whether they be carbs or fats or proteins etc). They sell us on an ‘easy’ way to do just that, but the bottom line is that they all aim for the same.
  • very low calorie diets are not harmful to an individual who carries more weight than they need
  • being overweight is seriously bad for us. Robbing us not only of years of life, but more importantly - healthy years.
  • how much weight we lose is not magical or mysterious. To lose 1lb of fat from our bodies we need to consume 3500kcal less than our body needs. If you lose more, it’s more than likely water. I think this one hit hard after many experiences with slimming world etc where a weekly weight loss of 10lb or more would be deemed fine where to actually loose that much FAT one would need to cut out 35,000 kcal ( with daily average for many overweight people being no more than 3000kcal)

There is a lot more there and I keep thinking on the bits I read so keen to compare notes. Anybody else read it?

OP posts:
strongandlong · 17/01/2019 15:34

I'm half way through. It's really good. I

've definitely fallen into some of these traps. For me it's "I'm really fit, so it doesn't matter that I'm fat" and "keeping weight off is too hard" with a lot of support from some of the others! It's good for making you face up to the truth!

aniawl · 18/01/2019 11:07

I found it refreshingly simple. I’m still a bit on the fence about very low calorie diet - as someone on another thread mentioned, it’s not that physically those diets will cause any yo-yo but that psychologically they can trigger deprivation-binge cycle. Maybe. Who knows. But as that wasn’t the biggest takeaway for me from the book, I just move past it.

In the past I did low carb, then slimming world, then for health reasons - ultra low fat ( which I hated) and they all had the same thing in common : I was losing weight through the simple fact that because some foods were discouraged, the net calorie intake was smaller. But long term I always found it unsustainable.

I’ve now switched to calorie counting and it’s actually incredibly freeing. It’s up to me to manage my energy budget. If I want a cake and a bottle of wine one one day, I’ll have a light soup and salad the next and the net amount is the same. I’d all within my reach.

The ‘magical thinking’ about what various foods do to me was definitely stopping me from losing weight before. I feel much more positive about it now.

OP posts:
starryeyed19 · 18/01/2019 11:36

I haven't but I might look it up now, thanks!

UGotTheLook · 29/12/2019 12:31

Yes, I thought it was a really helpful book. It shot down a couple of the lies I tell myself. It's kinda a hard read emotionally - I had to put it down for a few seconds for some deep breaths a couple of times. Butit's def the best thing I've ever read on being fat and weightloss. I can't recommend it highly enough. It is a bit of tough love in some parts, but I prefer that when it's accurate.

PeriComoToes · 30/12/2019 16:15

I realise that this is a bit of a zombie but I've now read the article in the guardian as a result. Very interesting. Is there a lot more information in the book or is it just a more padded out (no pun intended) version of the article?

I wonder how the OP is getting on

UGotTheLook · 02/01/2020 11:24

It's one of the best books of its kind for NOT being padded out, but as I've read so, so many books and articles about weightloss over the last three decades, not everything was new to me. I never felt bored or irritated though. There were a few things that were totally new to me that made it well worth buying - things like how after big weightloss it takes a good few months for the ribcage to shrink. Who knew?

SunshineAvenue · 02/01/2020 17:37

Wow! UGotThelook that is a new one to me. I had no idea that the ribcage would shrink. Mind blown!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.