Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Infant feeding

Get advice and support with infant feeding from other users here.

FF - When did you move from first milk?

9 replies

ohnelly · 12/05/2010 11:01

Hi all I am ff my DS, currently 5 weeks on Aptimal first milk & was just interested to know when it is usual to move to the second stage milk? As in how old was the baby & how did you know they were ready/needed to? thanks

OP posts:
islandofsodor · 12/05/2010 11:05

We tried to change at 6 months but dd got awful stomach pains and contipation so we stayed with first milk until 12 months when she went onto cows milk.

islandofsodor · 12/05/2010 11:06

But 6 months is the earliest you can change. There is hungry baby milk but I didn;t like the idea of that as it bloats them and isn't good for their digestion.

cravingcroissants · 12/05/2010 11:07

They have to have first milk or breastmilk until 6 months I thought.

ohnelly · 12/05/2010 11:13

Oh it was the hungry baby milk that I meant as the next stage - so I assume thats just if the first milk isnt satisfying them?

OP posts:
islandofsodor · 12/05/2010 11:17

I would just up the quantities rather than change to hungry baby milk. It has different rations of whey and casein and just makes them feel fuller for longer whereas what a small baby needs is to be fed little and often.

ohnelly · 12/05/2010 11:21

Ok thanks I wasnt thinking of changing at the moment anyway as he seems happy enough on the first milk still - was just interested to see what others did

OP posts:
BornToFolk · 12/05/2010 11:29

You don't have to use the hungry baby stuff. DS was on first milk (also Aptamil) until about 8 months. We just increased the quantity until 6 months as he needed it.

After weaning at 6 months, he dropped a couple of bottles when he was eating more solids.

We switched to follow on at about 8 months, mainly because it's what I felt he "should" have and I was worried about iron...totally sucked in by the marketing on that one!

narmada · 14/05/2010 11:58

I may be completely wrong, but I think (someone more knowledgeable, please?!) that there is no need at all to move on to second-stage or follow-on milk? It is just a marketing con, so they can get round the advertising legislation I think.

Seona1973 · 14/05/2010 12:34

Second stage is hungry milk and cannot be advertised. Follow on can be marketed as it is aimed at babies over 6 months. I used hungry milk from around 14 weeks and it helped keep ds more settled between feeds (even though he didnt really go much further between feeds). It never bloated him or constipated him.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread