Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

Infant feeding

Get advice and support with infant feeding from other users here.

How can this be legal ?

6 replies

Fibilou · 03/03/2010 21:55

Was looking in Boots today and saw some Aptimel which had "Breastmilk subsitute" on the packaging, in quite large letters. Surely this contravenes the code that governs the formula manufacturers ?

OP posts:
flowerybeanbag · 03/03/2010 21:59

They all have it I think. Because formula is a substitute for breastmilk. If you're not breastfeeding for whatever reason, you should substitute your breastmilk with formula.

verylittlecarrot · 03/03/2010 22:13

I thought it was follow-on milks which claimed to be not substitutes? In an attempt to avoid the legislation governing infant formulas...happy to be corrected.

BertieBotts · 03/03/2010 22:31

Yes infant formulas from birth have to be labelled "breastmilk substitutes" but follow on milks from 6 months+ are not labelled this because breastmilk substitutes are not allowed to be advertised - so they have to state that the follow on is not a breastmilk substitute, which is bollocks because it obviously is one!

verylittlecarrot · 03/03/2010 22:36

yes the aptamil TV advert drives me nuts on this point "if you decide to 'move on' from breastfeeding...use aptamil blah blah"

small print at bottom of screen > "not a breastmilk substitute"

sungirltanhasanactualhairstyle · 03/03/2010 22:36

well i guess labelling it 'breastmilk substitute' is better than labelling it 'superior baby food' or some such

mummyof2byapril · 04/03/2010 08:24

At least we all know 'substitute' means 'an inferior false version, not the real thing'

New posts on this thread. Refresh page