Just finished reading Gill Rapley's Baby-Led Weaning book and feel yet again utterly demoralised about my failure to breast-feed my baby. I managed to bf DS (now approaching 3 months) for 3 weeks, the result of which was huge depression and physical/mental pain for me, delayed bonding, dramatically underweight baby and unhappy family. We tried EVERYTHING to make it work - had lots of help from midwives, HVs and even (an extremely expensive!) lactation specialist, whose verdict was 'hmm, you're going to struggle with this...' - and I was ultimately given a lot of encouragement to stop trying, which helped me feel (a teeny bit) less of a failure.
Switching to formula was the best decision for everyone, and we are now a happy and healthy family. I was looking forward to finding out about weaning DS, so bought GR's BLW book. Having just finished it I cannot believe how angry I am that it essentially reads like an advert for the benefits of bf-ing. There are dozens of quotes from parents about how great BLW is but only ONE mentions that their child was formula-fed, all the rest are from breast-feeding mums. There is even a special little chapter all about how perfect the bf to BLW transition is - I honestly felt like there should have been blurb on the back saying 'of course, if you have formula fed your baby you might as well spoon-feed him raw sewage cos he's already f*ed up'.
I am an educated woman and I KNOW breast is best! But the breast-feeding stats in the UK clearly demonstrate that thousands of mums are formula -feeding - why should this book alienate them and imply they won't be interested in a healthy beginning to weaning their children? Maybe it doesn't, and IABU?? Sorry for rant, comments welcome. Feel free to flame, am off for a cuppa anyway...