DD is nine months and I have mentioned in passing my intent to continue BF until at least 12 months and revisit the issue then and decide what to do based on DD's state.
My mum is starting to put me under pressure to stop. Now, I didn't get married to please her and I didn't join her religion, so I'm not going to stop just for her, but I would like some ammunition for the inevitable conversations.
1 - the WHO recommends BF'ing until 2 years
Response: well, maybe that's the recommendation for the World but not us
2 - US Surgeon General says a baby would be lucky to be breastfed to two
Response: oh, that's meant for lower-income families
Her other argument is that it's "embarrassing" to have a toddler undoing your top and pawing at your boobs. (she added "in church" so I suspect that has something to do with it). She managed to tell my little sister that "God doesn't want to see your belly button" so I suspect her idea of an all-seeing, all-knowing God is one that doesn't have x-ray vision.
Erm, kay. What are boobs for then?
She seems to think that by 12 months there's plenty of other places that DD could be getting nutrients so it isn't necessary to BF, and that me carrying on because it is a source of comfort to DD is wrong (and I think she secretly thinks it's a bit perverted). Saying it's good for DD is met with arguments that there are plenty of other places to get good stuff that aren't breasts.
I need better responses than to roll my eyes. I've made the face at my parents far too often lately.
I'm the oldest of six kids, and she did BF them all back in the 80's when BF'ing rates were at their lowest (she weaned us when our teeth came in), so I can't rightly tell her she doesn't know what she's talking about.