Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Infant feeding

Get advice and support with infant feeding from other users here.

Can I baby pass on HIV / AIDS to a woman breastfeeding him / her?

27 replies

imanaunty · 24/07/2009 06:25

Hi,

I was out with my mum, sister and nephew today. His mum (my sister) was away for a few minutes and he was crying. I told him I would feed him if I could...

We got talking about Salma Hayek, and how she had breastfed a baby when her mother was too sick to do it herself.

My mother thought it was very foolish to do this, as she thought the baby would be able to pass on AIDS to her.

I thought it was a beautiful, selfless loving act.

Can a baby pass on HIV / AIDS to a woman breasfeeding him / her?

Thx

OP posts:
PrincessToadstool · 24/07/2009 06:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Devendra · 24/07/2009 07:19

The maother was sat next to her while she did the PR selfless act. She looked incredibly distressed uncomfortable with the whole thing.

OnlyWantsOne · 24/07/2009 07:32

OOoo... I have no idea what you are all talking about? Please xplain?

imanaunty when you said you would feed your nephew, whilst your sister wasn't there, were you talking about breast or bottle?

kazbeth · 24/07/2009 07:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LeninGrad · 24/07/2009 08:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LeninGrad · 24/07/2009 08:55

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

tiktok · 24/07/2009 08:58

Search archives for discussions on this, OnlyWantsOne.

kazbeth, the mother of the baby is standing next to SH while she bf - some of the versions of this clip show this quite clearly. In all of them the baby is plump and healthy-looking; not clear why mum was not bf or expressing.

ilovemydogandmrobama · 24/07/2009 09:01

Interesting, but think not as it would mean that HIV/AIDs is able to be transmitted orally, and it isn't AFAIK (baby to mother. mother - baby is possible)

LeninGrad · 24/07/2009 09:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

salvadory · 24/07/2009 09:03

breastfeeding if the mother is HIV+ is not a complex issue. It's a don't do it, ever. The virus can be passed on in the breastmilk and for that reason HIV+ mothers in the UK are actively told NOT to breastfeed.
Interesting question about it going the other way, there may be a small risk but I'll check today and find out.

LeninGrad · 24/07/2009 09:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

reikizen · 24/07/2009 09:15

I am supposing there is a theoretical risk (like for example there is a theoretical risk that it can be transmitted via fluid entering the eye) but there is no record of a case. An entry site + infected fluid is a theoretical risk but would probably need such a huge about of baby saliva that it would never actually occur. Like snogging? Anyway, not sure why she was bfing and did not express. Sounds like a PR opportunity to me, if she actually did it for the cameras so I am positive she put herself at no risk (think of the insurance!!!)

salvadory · 24/07/2009 09:21

ARV's do not prevent transmission of the virus through the breastmilk, obviously if a child is starving a mother would breastfeed but there will be a risk of virus transmission even if on Antiretrovirals. There's a big debate going on at present about the use of condoms during sexual intercourse in HIV+ individuals who are virologically supressed (using ARV's). i.e whether it's necessary to bother and whilst the risks are much lower there are still risks.

ilovemydogandmrobama · 24/07/2009 09:22

There are various theories as to why Salma did what she did, but she was visiting an orphanage (I think?) in Africa, and she was b/fing at the time, so fed another baby after hearing that the mother couldn't.

Personally, think it was one of those stimulus response things. Don't know about anyone else, but when I was away from my DCs when I was b/fing, if a child cried in a 5 mile radius, my breasts would be painful

LeninGrad · 24/07/2009 09:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

salvadory · 24/07/2009 09:34

I just don't see why is it good enough advice for people here not to BF if HIV+ but people in developing countries are expected to bear the risk?? We surely get the best ARV's money has to buy in the western world and yet in developing countries where people are lucky to get the drugs that people here would tunr their noses up at women are expected to BF too.
What an awful dilemma of the women in those countries who have to BF knowing they may infect their children but if they don;t their babies go hungry

LeninGrad · 24/07/2009 09:37

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

wannaBe · 24/07/2009 09:37

I don't imagine it will have been something that has been widely studied. After all most babies that are HIV positive will have been infected by their mother, either in utero or during the birth, therefore the mother would already be infected thus meaning the transmition risk from baby to mother was irelevant.

As for Salma Hayek, I think that made for quite uncomfortable viewing tbh. For me it just smacked of "oh look at me, rich wester woman coming to show you poor African women how it's done."

wannaBe · 24/07/2009 09:42

salvadory in the developing world it has to do with more than just the availability of ARV's though. It has to do with the safety of water with which formula would be mixed, which in itself poses its own risks.

Iirc women with HIV are advised to exclusively bf or not at all, as mixed feeding affects the gut which in turn can increase the risk of the baby being infected with HIV through breastmilk. Add to that the fact that water in the developing world means that formula feeding carries additional risks than it would in the western world, and you have a senario where exclusive breastfeeding is the best option for women with HIV in the developing world.

wastingmyeducation · 24/07/2009 09:48

That's right, in many developing nations the risk of transmission is lower than the likelihood of dying from being bottle-fed.

HoppityBunny · 24/07/2009 19:14

And also if the baby is exclusively breastfed rather than mixed fed by a HIV/AID mother. The baby is much less likely to get the virus, cos if mixed fed, the formula breaks down the baby's protective breast-milk lining.

HoppityBunny · 24/07/2009 19:16

Sorry girls, just noticed what I wrote is said already, go on you "wannaBe"! My baby boy is grumpy tonight - I am not reading properly!

joyjac · 24/07/2009 22:59

Some interesting stuff on here. In Third World countries the risks of formula feeding are so much higher, infant mortality rates are still way beyond what would be accepted in any Western society. Gastroenteritis here is a nuisance, in many countries it is an infant killer

salvadory · 25/07/2009 10:17

I am aware of the risks of unclean water supplies and the pitfalls of formula feeding which is why it's such an awful dilemma for the mother, she has milk which she knows carries a risk yet the sanitation issue presents yet another risk. If an HIV+ mother breast feeds her child then there is a definite risk of passing on to the child. Exclusive formula feeding has it's own risks which can also be fatal in these countries.
Starvation/infection from dirty water or HIV+ status, not great options

hunkermunker · 25/07/2009 23:41

Salvadory, my understanding was that if you were HIV+, exclusive bf was protective (or could be - viral load, etc needed taking into account), but instantly anything other than bmilk was ingested by the child, all bf had to cease.

It's not as simple as "HIV+, don't breastfeed" from what I've read.