I fully admit this is a bit of a guilt-indulging thread, so if you don't want to read my self-flagellating nonsense please feel free to move on.
I always thought of myself as having "exclusively" breast-fed DD until she was about 6 months old, when we started introducing regular bottles of formula because I was back to work. However, I've been reading some other bits and pieces on here that have made me look again at the definition, and now I feel like I didn't make as much of an effort as I could have.
So her feeding history is this:
- Drip feed in SCBU for the first 12 hours because I fell asleep after a long labour and EMCS, and no one woke me up to express as per my request
- 2 formula feeds in SCBU the second day, because her blood sugar was low and because she was jaundiced and sleepy, it was tricky to get her to latch properly and suckle for long (nurse insisted, telling me it was either FF or put her back on the drip)
- 3 top-up FFs on the ward the third day, from a cup, after BFing, which brought her blood sugar up to an "acceptable" level and MW agreed she didn't need it anymore
- 1 bottle of EBM a day from 4 weeks
- baby rice with EBM once a day from 17 weeks
- fruit purees from 21 weeks
- occasional ready-mix FF from 5 months, if DH ran out of EBM before I got home from work
- gradual introduction of soy formula (dairy was exacerbating eczema) from 6 months, replacing one BF with formula every couple of weeks
- just dropped the last BF at 8 months
Do I at least qualify for "predominantly" breastfeeding?
Again, sorry for the "poor-me" attitude here but I just wanted to vent it so it didn't build up.