Just trying to think about this in advance to avoid what happened last time with ds1 - am expecting ds2 in July.
If the baby simply won't breastfeed, how long before you really need to get something down them, and how much? How do you know?
I had such conflicting instructions from 3 different paediatricians while in hospital (for 5 days just trying to get bfing established). The first one stuck a canular in ds's arm in case of need, took his blood sugar every few hours and gave me dire warnings about him not having bfed in the first 12 hours, the second then put us on a hellish 3-hourly routine day and night involving me trying to bf, then expressing, then giving ds colostrum, and then formula-feeding (milk didn't come in till day 5 and they weren't happy with the amount of colostrum I was getting). The last paed, whom I saw on day 5, looked at his notes, threw a strop at the others, told us ds had been 'ridiculously over-medicalised', watched me do a slightly better breastfeed (finally) and sent us home grumbling that ds never needed formula in the first place.
I just don't want to spend all that time in hospital again if I don't have to (or give ds2 formula if I don't have to). But not sure I would have the confidence to discharge myself and ds2 if I am again being told his health is at risk by people who ought to know best. Anyone got any wise words about how to cope with conflicting advice and is there something authoritative I can refer to?