I'm wondering if one of the experts on here could give me a word to cheer me up.
My 13 mo dd was only ever BF. No bottles, or even dummies. We never had problems until she was sick a month ago and went on a nursing strike - from which she has not returned. I've tried everything and more to encourage her to start again. I've even spent days walking around topless (at home ), to remind her that my boobs are here. And yet, she is completely and totally uninterested - except for the occasional bite.
I have been expressing 3x/day since the strike began, but my supply has dwindled. The last few days I can spend hours pumping and getting only drops. My plan was to keep trying for at least 40 days - as I read a blog about a 40 day nursing strike. Day 31, and it looks like my breasts have given up. I think I have to admit it is over.
I know I should be happy that I got to 12 months, as many people struggle, but I just wasn't ready to stop. I wanted to follow the 2 year WHO guidelines. Plus, I miss it terribly. It was such a wonderful, fulfilling, serene part of being a mother to her.
SO I keep reading that babies don't self-wean earlier than 18-24 months. The implication being that if a baby weans at this age it is basically mother-led. But here I am, desperate for her not to wean, and yet feeling like a failed breastfeeding mum.
... I guess I am wondering if the experts think that in circumstances like these it is self-weaning, even if it is classified as "early" and therefore "rare". And therefore, if she is ready to move on then she is not actually missing out on anything from a nutritional or emotional perspective. If I can think about it this way, I'll feel a lot better. (Yes, needing this reassurance is slightly neurotic, I know, but I suspect I'm also hormonal).
Thanks also to everyone who was so lovely on my other threads (here) (and here). Your support was amazing, and all of your tips were really helpful - even if she didn't recover from the strike, at least I feel like I tried everything I could.