OK, one last try (not to make people agree, but to try to explain the thinking):
This is not a 'natural' shot. It might well contain truthful elements, but it is posed and styled.
In the process of taking this promotional shot, the photographer/stylist/whatever has adopted a series of cliched sexualised tropes. So the jeans are not loose, they are tight. The legs are not closed, they are open. The subject is lying prone on a bed. Her hair is long, glossy, styled and artfully arranged.
None of these elements is in any sense 'wrong'. The cumulative effect, however, IMO, is to produce a cliched, sexualised image.
If this is one in a series of images to promote bfing, then great, no problem. If it is the only or the main image, then I think it's a bit of a shame to use an image that unquestioningly reproduces so many aspects of female objectification.
I have no problem with nudity; I have a problem with stylised, cliched objectification.
I have no problem with extended bfing or tandem feeding. I am currently doing the first and very nearly did the second.
And, if I can grant myself the license to speculate wildly that VVVQ and others have granted themselves so freely on here, some of you are deeply uncomfortable with being disagreed with, even in perfectly amiable terms. Maybe it's something to do with your upbringing? Or perhaps it's low blood sugar. Or maybe you're all completely thick. I don't know, but I sure feel entitled to tell you anyway.