Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Infant feeding

Get advice and support with infant feeding from other users here.

yesterdays's Guardian article on formula - odd BF statistics?

14 replies

thehouseofmirth · 13/07/2008 17:03

Is it just me or do the stats on breastfeeding at the end of this article seem totally wrong or at best misleading?

OP posts:
princessofpower · 13/07/2008 17:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

StealthPolarBear · 13/07/2008 17:09

they must be wrong

StealthPolarBear · 13/07/2008 17:10

"Gail Johnston, educational and professional development adviser at the Royal College of Midwives, said mothers with concerns should talk to their health visitor before changing in case there were specific reasons for their babies being on a particular formula."

wouldn't the mother know if that was the case?

ExterminAitch · 13/07/2008 17:14

how utterly moronic. what a fuck-up on the part of the journalist.

me23 · 13/07/2008 17:23

copied from article...
'The NHS encourages mothers to breastfeed if possible. Its last big survey, in 2005, suggested 76% of mothers did so for at least six months, up from 69% in 2000. Half of all mothers continued breastfeeding after six months.''

six months! surely if anything they mean 6 days! or weeks.

policywonk · 13/07/2008 17:24

Yes, I thought this. Must mean weeks, surely? I expect to see something in Corrections and Clarifications tomorrow...

thehouseofmirth · 13/07/2008 17:27

I've emailed them.

OP posts:
NotQuiteCockney · 13/07/2008 17:30

Hmmm, this might include mixed feeding?

But the stats sound unduly high, yes. I made a bit of a face at the paper yesterday.

NotQuiteCockney · 13/07/2008 17:32

Ah, right, this article says 76% of mothers start out breastfeeding. Less than half breastfeeding at 6 weeks, 25% breastfeeding at 6 months.

God, that's depressing.

policywonk · 13/07/2008 17:33

You wouldn't get these sloppy stats in Bad Science.

kiskidee · 13/07/2008 17:48

"A third poster said: "Companies will capitalise where they can in order to keep their profit margins and with formula it is a captive market as no one has the choice not to feed her baby."

I have been quoted by the Guarnaid. heh heh.

hunkermunker · 14/07/2008 00:17

Aha, found the other thread talking about the article.

A journalist who only read the opening paragraph of a summary and doesn't understand the word "initiation" apparently.

thumbwitch · 14/07/2008 00:29

wooh, 2 threads on the same thing - I too thought it should be 6 weeks (posted on the other thread}; the stats NQC has quoted seem much more likely from what I remember.

thehouseofmirth · 16/07/2008 18:38

They've printed a correction here. It should indeed be the stats NQC quoted.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread