I just want to clarify that what the women in the earthquake did, was fantastic. I was ot suggesting that that wasn't.
I was referring to nappyaddict's post about looking after a friends baby for the evening, runnig out of milk and br feeding the baby herself. I know it was with permission. Its just a situation like that seems wrong to me, it hardly constitutes a starving baby. NA, i'm ot saying this in a really nasty way, I promise you, ( you know me better than that - I hope! ) I'm just really shocked!
A pre arranged situation, where a baby is wet-nursed from birth, or, as part of the social/family situation, where it is the norm, and agreed by all etc, again, is not what i was referring to. It's quite unusual, but again, not necessarily 'abnormal'.
Just the idea that if my DD was with a friend, and she wasn't settling with a bottle of EBM etc that a friend would even think to breast feed her herself, would be wrong. I'd never even consider thinking such a thing, unless it was what we all did... or unless, as I say, under exceptional circumstances such as the earhtquake or some kind of disaster etc...
I am not saying that wetnursing in itself is 'not normal' just as a drop of the hat, solution to a crying baby... that is what seems wrong to me. But, both NA ad her friend were happy, so it is just my opinion.
I would do exactly the same as the Police woman in china under the same circumstances, of course I would! If I were able, and there were properly starving babies there, then i'd not hesitate. I'd do ^anything& I possibly could to preserve their lives.