Lately, it seems that my 13 (nearly 14) month ds is less interested in his morning feed, because, for the last few days, he has bitten me after his feed. Today, he hardly had any milk before biting me. This is fine with me, as it feels a good time to stop if ds wants to. He has had the benefit of 14 months of feeding, and now I only have to worry about getting him to drink cows' milk!
Anyway...that is not the problem. I mentioned the above to dh this morning, and he said "Good, it's about time that he stopped anyway. It's disgusting to feed them this long." When pushed, he said that he didn't think that I was disgusting, but that he didn't feel that children should be fed past a year, as they were no longer babies.
As I have already said, on another thread, I wanted to stop before ds could walk and talk, as I felt more comfortable about this, and I AM fine with stopping as ds seems to want to. What I am worried about is dh's comments. I feel a bit belittled by them. I told him about WHO's recommendations to feed children longer than a year (was it to age 2?), and told him that he should check his facts before spouting off about something that he knew nothing about. However, it has really p**sed me off.
I have been feeling a bit blue lately anyway, crying at the slightest things on TV etc. DH does do this quite often about various topics (I won't quote his recent one about people who go to the car boot sale that I intend to sell at on Sunday!), but this time it feels quite personal. I call him 'Victor' a lot now because he is turning into a right whinger about a lot of things, but I am thinking that maybe 'Alf Garnet' would be a better name!
Please all tell me that I'm not wrong to have fed ds this long. Up until now, I have felt proud of my achievement, as it is very unlike me to stick with something this long with such enthusiasm. Sorry to drone on!