Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Infant feeding

Get advice and support with infant feeding from other users here.

Making it to 6 months without solids...

29 replies

Cavy · 26/09/2004 07:53

I didn't last time, would really like to now (baby breastfed, only 14 weeks old). How do I resist the social pressure to start earlier, the attitude that it will make him sleep better (never worked with my first 2!), and my own curiousity about will he like it? Plus, I am starting work soon and I know I would worry less if baba was on solids not just my EBM.

Thing is, I remember when my last baby reached 6 months I just couldn't imagine her not being on solids. She was so happily, firmly established on them. But I don't think any of those reasons (curiousity, social pressure, etc.) is good enough reason to start.

Sorry for the ramble. Is anyone in the same boat of trying to resist the temptation to start early? Right now I am trying to motivate myself by thinking how proud I'll be to point at DS when he's 6 months old and 8-9kg and think "I did that!" "That's all my hard work, that lovely plump baby."

OP posts:
yurtgirl · 27/09/2004 12:13

Message withdrawn

throckenholt · 27/09/2004 19:05

it always puzzles me why people are so keen to start on solids - I kept putting it off (especially with my second ones) - kept saying - tomorrow . I just found the whole thing such a faff and so messy that I really had no urge to do it early. I thikn it was nearer 7 months by the time I actually got round to giving some mush to my twins.

cellulitequeen · 27/09/2004 19:14

I gave in to all the advice I received at the time and started weaning at just under 5m ("oh he'll sleep throught night when he's on solids" - what a load of crap, he didn't sleep through until at least 9m). DS thrived on my BM and is such a bonny lad and with hindsight, I'd have left it until at least 6 months. Why faff when you don't need too?

cellulitequeen · 27/09/2004 19:16

Sorry, for all the grammar sticklers out there - I meant "to" - shouldn't have had that G&T!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread