Search the mumsnet archives for this, bouncing, as we have discussed it a few times.
You are right to be sceptical about what you friend has heard. Vit D is indeed added as a supplement to formula (as it is removed when the cows milk is skimmed to make formula) but this does not mean formula is 'better' than breastmilk, which also has a biologically appropriate amount of Vit D in it already
Modern lifestyles cause some concern in some circles, especially for Asian or black babies, as the UK sunlight is weak and basically, some of us don't get out in it often enough. It's not an issue with infants - the mother's own Vit D will have given the baby stores of it in pg, and her breastmilk adds to it - but older babies need more of it, and if they stay indoors a lot or else only venture out covered top to toe with no skin showing at all, they won't get their quota.
Now, this can be resolved by goig outside most days for a short time (don't know if it has to be 20 mins) or if this is really not possible for some reason, giving supplements of Vit D after the age of about six months if the baby is breastfed.
Nature evolved breastmilk over many hundreds of thousands of generations, and of course the VitD in it is what babies need - but nature assumes we are outside more than many of us are in the 21st century.
Hope this explains it. There are very few cases of rickets in the UK, just to put the 'risk' into perspective.