Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Infant feeding

Get advice and support with infant feeding from other users here.

More anti breast feeding in the press

68 replies

LAF77 · 14/08/2012 11:57

This makes my blood boil as it is filled with lies!

m.mirror.co.uk/article?id=1259599/

OP posts:
Mombojombo · 14/08/2012 12:04

I couldn't even get angry about this one, it reads so much like a joke. Just absolute, utter cobblers. People really are scared of breastfeeding aren't they!? Is it because we let our babies (oooerrr) suck (oooerrr) our dirty pillows (oooerrr) and they drink our bodily fluids (ooerrr) which are like poo and wee and bogies?

Honest to betsy it's hilarious. But yes, offensive, inaccurate and dangerous "journalism".

LAF77 · 14/08/2012 12:22

It is a joke because it is filled with so many untruths, but it puts pressure on women to stop breast feeding at such an early stage. Handily, just in time for follow on milk to be required if you believe the telly!

Women may be put under pressure by men to stop as it is weird to breast feed when they read such tripe.

Must be my hormones that make me mad about this, apparently Nestle has her on retainer as a consultant!

OP posts:
Indith · 14/08/2012 12:51

Many mothers wean their babies around four months anyway and in the Third World it?s often an economic necessity.

Yes in the third world where women cannot afford formula milk so water it down. Not to mention don't have access to clean water to make it up with Oh yes it is absolutely wonderufl that women in developing countries wean at 4 months.(see Miriam? Developing countries not Third World, that name is outdated and insulting).

Plus breast milk often doesn?t deliver the iron needed for a six-month baby.

Oh do your research you moron.

This mother belongs to the school of extreme parenting where mums breast-feed into late childhood, let their child sleep with them and, as babies, carry them everywhere in a sling

Exreme parenting? Extreme? Who cares where the baby sleeps of how it is carried? I carry my baby in a sling all the time, it leaves my hands free to hold hands with the big 2 when we cross roads. You know, so they don't get flattened. Highly irresponsible I am.

No young child should be asked to shoulder the burden of such a decision.

If you subscribe to that, which other decisions would you let your child make? To go to nursery or not? To get up in the morning or stay in bed? It?s clearly wrong.

I'm sorry I just PMSL at that one (yes probably literally, 3 vaginal births'll do that to you). Do you not think there is a difference between a child deciding when to stop having milk, a food, source of comfort, way of reconnecting with mummy at the end of a day at nursery and a non negotiable decision like nursery while mummy is at work etc? Anyway most parents DO allow their child some element of choice, they choose a childcare setting their child is happy with, they allow their child to choose clothes and personally apart from mornings when we have to be somewhere I allow my children to get up when they are ready and have slept enough (usually way too early for my liking!).

No. This is about mothers who desire to keep their child dependent on them.

Yeah I just love getting up at night and not being able to go out of an evening. Love it. Can't get enough of staying at home while dh and friends go out.

A parent should be encouraging a child to be independent.

Responding to their needs means they grow up secure that their needs will be met. It fosters independence.

Far from it being upsetting, most babies offered a mixed diet are happy about it.

Well yeah,nobody said it was mean and evil to mix feed. People who breastfeed don't tend to be like that. It is just you morons who do us the same favour and live and let live. anyway just because a child is happy without being breastfed it doesn't follow that the breastfed child it unhappy. Which, lets face it, is pretty much what oyu are trying to imply.

My guide is the appearance of teeth.

Nature arranges for them to erupt when a baby needs food that has to be chewed

You do know a child can be born with teeth right? Does that mean a baby born with teeth should never be breastfed and should be offered solids from birth?

Angry
5madthings · 14/08/2012 12:54

i was about to post a thread on this so glad i checked first!

bloody appaling of stoppard imo, as a dr people will think she has a valid opinion and its just bollocks! Angry

ChunkyPickle · 14/08/2012 13:01

No young child should be asked to shoulder the burden of such a decision.

That is my favourite bit - as if DS is sitting in the corner, collapsing under the pressure of the choice of when/if to feed.

The problem isn't that she's woefully ignorant on how extended breast-feeding works - most people who haven't fed to toddlerhood are, and that's fine, why would they know anything about it if they haven't done it - it's that she's got a newspaper column and is spouting that tripe

Nature arranges for them to erupt when a baby needs food that has to be chewed

Actually, this bit is almost right - Once they've got all their molars (ie. can chew) they'll be down to almost no feeds, and from what I understand lose the ability to suckle properly anyhow.

She sounds like the people tutting over me carrying DS in a wrap where I could fall over, rather than in a nice safe buggy.

Wheresmycaffeinedrip · 14/08/2012 13:03

I was a bottle feeder but even I know that's a load of bollocks!!!! I cannot believe someone got away with writing that crap!!!

KateSpade · 14/08/2012 13:06

I'm scared of breast feeding, serious phobia. But I remove myself from the situation in a subtle way, without making anyone feel awkward.
I wouldn't tell the mother to stop either.

Indith · 14/08/2012 13:06

Chunky I find the "almost right" part bout the teeth the scariest. Afterall the best way to spread confusion is with a seed of truth.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 14/08/2012 13:10

WTF!

Babies should stop feeding when they have teeth!!?

The problem is that the piece reads like medical info rather than a woefully misinformed opinion piece.

Clicky link:

m.mirror.co.uk/article?id=1259599/

MimsyBorogroves · 14/08/2012 13:12

Load of tosh, the lot of it.

I am also confused by the "not enough iron for a 6 month old" and the implied suggestion that when teeth erupt breastfeeding should cease because they should be chewing food.

So DS2, 8 months, should stop breastfeeding because he's not getting enough iron. But he shouldn't stop because he has no teeth, so he's okay to carry on. And he shouldn't be chewing food because of the lack of teeth.

Poor child must be beyond confused.

5madthings · 14/08/2012 13:16

what is good about this article tho are the comments underneath! when i looked earlier there were 5 pages of people basically telling her how WRONG and misinformed she was! Grin

Indith · 14/08/2012 13:16

Oh Mimsy your poor baby. That confusion must be very upsetting for him. I think you should stop feeding and give him formula because Miriam Stoppard said that babies who are given formula are happy so it must be the right thing to do. You really shouldn't burden your child with the uncertainly of not knowing if he should be breastfed or not, it just isn't fair.

fhdl34 · 14/08/2012 13:17

Is she actually a real doctor? What an awful piece and written like fact as well, short and sharp!
My ILs read the mirror, lord help me!

nickelcognito · 14/08/2012 13:19

Miriam Stoppard? Shock

how out of date she is!
there are many good reasons why the WHO says 6 months, and lots of research has been done into it!

Faverolles · 14/08/2012 13:23

Ds3 has lots of molars and still feeds loads.
Perhaps he didn't read the memo.

Sadly, her views are very common amongst Drs (and HV's and midwives), so this doesn't surprise me at all.

LAF77 · 14/08/2012 13:24

Apparently, she has an OBE!

nickel the WHO says EBF for 6 months and continuing to bf for a minimum of 2 years whilst the child's immune system is developing.

OP posts:
ATruthUniversallyAcknowledged · 14/08/2012 13:28

*My guide is the appearance of teeth.

Nature arranges for them to erupt when a baby needs food that has to be chewed.

That should be when breast-feeding is gently suspended.*

Hahahahahah. WTAF? My son would have starved if I'd 'gently suspended' feeding him when he was 6 weeks old!

ATruthUniversallyAcknowledged · 14/08/2012 13:28

Bold fail Blush You get the idea.

Helmondo · 14/08/2012 13:29

This makes me so angry when I read crap like this! It sounds like the sort of shite my dp's nan (who of course ff all her babies) would spout!

This is the kind of verbal diarrhoea I was fed by 'well meaning' family members which caused me to stop bf'ing dd1 at 3 weeks to stop the comments Sad

Dd2 of course is still bf at 6mo, and shall continue till the foreseeable future, said family members now know better than to pass comment on it Wink

Load of old tosh!! Angry

tethersphotofinish · 14/08/2012 13:33

'Extreme Parenting'

Have a vision of mums abseiling down the roof and swinging through the closed bedroom window to soothe little Jonny's cries before rollerblading to the kitchen to cook his fish fingers Grin

PeggyCarter · 14/08/2012 13:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

PeggyCarter · 14/08/2012 13:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ATruthUniversallyAcknowledged · 14/08/2012 13:40

Abseilling Tethers ? Pah. That's a bit mainstream isn't it? I tend to base jump to get to mine. And fishfingers? Come on woman. Any self respecting extreme parent would be offering Johnny Fugu wouldn't they?

Waves back at PuddleJumper Grin

LAF77 · 14/08/2012 13:40

No, tether and joyful my version of extreme parenting involves shoving my boob in my son's mouth against his will (sarcasm).

I'm lying here with him whilst he is napping. He wakes up with an upset face because he let my boob out of his mouth as he slept and I give it back to him and he drifts back to sleep.

OP posts:
NarkedRaspberry · 14/08/2012 13:40

Fruitloop.