I will admit to having previously been completely ignorant and influenced by friends, family and media about 'extended' bf. Admit that I may have once said to a non-mum friend 'I suppose if they can ask for it they shouldn't have it' and 'I suppose once the baby's around 12-18 months, there's no further nutritional benefit to the milk and its really only about the mother'. .
Then I had DS - and ohmigod, I can't see myself stopping until he is ready (he's only 6months). I totally agree with comments above - human milk for a human child, 'quick, lock 'em up, they must be insane! quick, get the cow's uddermilk instead, much less repulsive'.
I love breastfeeding so much i can't describe. I know my lovely healthy and, erm, chubby, baby has benefited from the perfect food, designed just for him.
What it comes down to i'm finding is that an awful lot of people object to bf, full stop. Others don't mind too much so long as its in private, or discreet, or or limited to a finite, arbitrary, time period. Others might only agree with breastmilk past, say, 6 months if it is in a bottle past. Add to all those isshooos is the (little britain be damned) 'bitty factor' of a 6m old+ sucking on the breast and boom: you have licence for a daytime TV programe to basically perpetuate ignorance and downright pathetic opinions.
My dad has already started to challenge me about breastfeeding my son. He said that as he's a big boy I might want to stop soon. I've had my mum nod in agreement - she stopped BFing my brother at 11months only at the insistence of my dad 'by then it really was only for me - I knew he was my last baby'. I think that all influenced my opinions about extended BF. And i had THOUGHT that I came from a BF friendly background!!!! Imagine if my mum had FF? I may not have even got to 6 months, let alone completely turnaround my views on the subject.