OK, looong back story but basically I have very extreme oversupply issues, so much so that we've been considering dietary intolerances too. Despite block feeding and cutting out dairy and soya (under a dietician's guidance) and then also wheat, DD is still having problems with reflux, disturbed sleep, painful gas and horrible mucusy green poos.
So eventually after being bounced around HVs, GPs and breastfeeding helplines I got an appointment with the infant feeding advisor at the hospital. She looked at a nappy and watched a feed and we had a chat and she agrees with me that DD isn't ill, she's really, really thriving in fact (read: enormously fat)
, but she's unhappy so lactose overload is the most likely problem.
So her advice was to express off the foremilk - just until I see the colour change - before letting her feed, to try and reduce her lactose intake. I can understand the logic of this - DD will then be taking in satisfying fatty hindmilk, produce less gas, sleep better, be more comfortable etc. Great. But this is surely just going to perpetuate the underlying problem? I said "Won't this just make it worse by increasing my supply?" but she said no, women who've had similar problems have had good results from doing this.
I'm going to phone her next week to check whether she means this for a few days or for a long term thing - but it seems totally counterintuitive. But this woman's job is purely to help BFing mums - she's got to know her stuff, right ...? 