Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Book of the month

Find reading inspiration on our Book of the Month forum.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

And our loved-up February Book of the Month is...THE ENCHANTED APRIL by Elizabeth Von Arnim (discussion Tuesday 24 February)

102 replies

TillyBookClub · 21/01/2009 10:26

We'll be chatting about our Book of the Month, THE ENCHANTED APRIL by Elizabeth Von Arnim, a witty, escapist classic, here on Tuesday 24 February from 8-10pm.

Don't forget you can order your copy here

Keen to know how the votes turned out? Have a snoop at the results here

And, for anyone who missed them first time round, here were February's passion-filled book choices

OP posts:
morningpaper · 24/02/2009 20:16

I enjoyed all the characters and thought there was a bit of each of them in me, IYKWIM. I really wanted to travel to a lovely castle, especially as it is so cold and miserable here. It left me with wild gardening fantasies every night.

lemurtamer · 24/02/2009 20:17

A massacre where the housekeeper stuffed everyone with meatballs for complaining! That would have been a surprise ending.

TillyBookClub · 24/02/2009 20:17

I'm edging towards the cream puff side. I loved the escapism, and thoroughly enjoyed the book. I thought the vinegary bits were very funny (especially the way Rose counter-offers Mrs Fisher cups of tea in the battle to be in control, plus the observant asides about husband and wife relationships), but essentially the plot twists were a mite too contrived and gloriously neat.

And you've got to question whether Lottie's unfailing optimism and serenity would last back in the grey streets of London (lets face it, her husband still counted her as 'useful' to him).

Did everyone believe in the husband's recognition of the beauty of their wives? I believed in Mellersh's more than Frederick's (mainy because Mellersh was still quite practical about it all and saw how many new clients he could get)

OP posts:
whistlejacket · 24/02/2009 20:20

morningpaper yes I loved the garden descriptions too, it made me want to be in a warm climate with lots of flowering plants and lovely scent. I thought the male characters were all a bit hopeless. I thought Scrap would have a fling with Mr Wilkins as she seemed to like him after seeing him in his towel

Wheelybug · 24/02/2009 20:21

Mellersh's was maybe more believable because it developed over a longer period of time in the book. Frederick arrived (by mistake) and suddenly fell in love (again) with Rose. Difficult to say whether either would last back in London but less so with Frederick's as it was so sudden.

morningpaper · 24/02/2009 20:23

Nah Freddie was basically there to dribble over Caroline. But he did seem grateful, which is always a charming quality in a husband.

It was contrived and neat but I enjoyed that - it made a bit of a change to be honest. I felt like I was reading one of the children's nice Enid Blyton books but with lovely prose and adult wit.

god it was SO much nicer than Wetlands which I have just finished

whistlejacket · 24/02/2009 20:25

It was hard to find the new-found beauty in their wives believable. Especially as they were described as so dowdy and plain at the beginning of the book. And also how could they be so beautiful when in the same room as Scrap. It's a nice sentiment though - who doesn't want their husband to find them beautiful after years of marriage?

morningpaper · 24/02/2009 20:29

Yes it's a lovely sentiment. We all know that really they would be thinking filthy inappropriate thoughts about Lady Caroline but who wants to dwell on that sort of nonsense all the time?

missclovis · 24/02/2009 20:32

I liked it, although it wasn't very profound. It was more a period comedy with some good observations about snobbery, social climbing and self delusion. I thought Mrs Fisher was a ghastly old woman and by far the most interesting character because she was so embittered.

coconutice · 24/02/2009 20:33

It was the perfect book for a dull Februray, warm and tingly. The Italian atmosphere I agree came across better than the characters, the colours and the smells, very evocative.

TillyBookClub · 24/02/2009 20:35

Okay, everyone's alternate ending please:

I think

Lady Caroline decides to wear the burka

Lottie and Mrs Fisher elope

Rose murders all men present by stuffing wisteria flowers into their mouths whilst asleep.

OP posts:
spursmummy · 24/02/2009 20:35

missclovis - good point! I'd read a whole book about Mrs Fisher, but not about the other characters.

CarrieMumsnet · 24/02/2009 20:37

Well there's been division over this book at Mumsnet Towers. We all enjoyed it but some more than others. I think I was expecting more romance, more drama, there seemed a lot of drama at the beginning (and I loved all that and the idea of escaping to a castle) and then a lot of frenzied activity at the end, but it was all a bit languid for me in the middle - though agree the vinegary bits were good. I love a happy ending so was glad about that but like Wheelybug I was also worried that the happiness was a bit ephemeral and might disappear once they left the sunshine... I do hope not.

Couldn't decide if it was just a light read, almost Mills and Boon-y or whether I was missing some deep and profound themes...so have been really looking forward to tonight's chat.. sorry I'm late

morningpaper · 24/02/2009 20:40

Lady Caroline should have decided that all men are awful and should have embarked on a life of christian chastity and mission

Lottie and Rose elope with Frederick's cash

Mrs Fisher forms exclusive club with Frederick and Mellersh so she has company and they have lots of work

Evil landlord lives lonely life for being so horrid to Rose

spursmummy · 24/02/2009 20:40

Alternate ending:

All the ladies decide to stay in Italy and get huge from eating pasta at every meal.

Mellersh and Freddie fall out of love with their wives because they're fat, fall in love with each other, and run off back to Hampstead.

morningpaper · 24/02/2009 20:41

What is that spursmummy, some sort of slashfic ending?

TillyBookClub · 24/02/2009 20:47

I agree about characters being stereotypical, and yet that was part of the enjoyment. I wallowed in the fact that the author wasn't trying to be too clever or tricksy. Enid Blyton is a good comparison, both like a guilty pleasure. Yet this was just witty enough to keep me charmed and not bored (Blyton definitely bored me).

I thought Lady Caroline was actually quite well drawn, her immediate recognition of people who were going to 'grab' and her world-weariness. Perhaps he terrible dilemma of being too beautiful was a little hard to stomach but I did like her.

Mrs Fisher was so annoying that I found it hard to get under her skin.

Rose and Lottie were both quite intriguing, but I found Lottie lost any edge once she became deliriously, armour-proofed happy. There was no suspense in her character development after that. And Rose was like a mournful labrador, waiting for its owner to come.

OP posts:
whistlejacket · 24/02/2009 20:47

Lotty and Rose throw their deceitful husbands into the sea

Mrs Fisher joins a hippy commune in California

Lady Caroline falls asleep with a cigarette in her hand and burns San Salvatore down. Briggs rescues her and all the servants but later dies of his injuries and Scrap decides she did love him after all and spends the rest of her life in mourning

GeraldineMumsnet · 24/02/2009 20:53

Loved the contrast between damp, dull, stuffy London and sensuous Italy, with gorgeous garden, lush food, sunshine and a sexy gardener. Despite caveat of weak ending, the bits of ephemeral joy pleased me. Reminds me of Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day. Grabbing a bit of joy while it's going.

morningpaper · 24/02/2009 20:53

Yes I agree tilly, Lottie could have been a bit darker. A nice lesbian ending would have been jolly.

Agree also that her dilemma of being too beautiful was a bit over-done. It verged on the fairy-tale porridge-pot sort of story, which was a bit irritating.

morningpaper · 24/02/2009 20:54

yy gerry

missclovis · 24/02/2009 20:56

Lottie leaves Mellersh to live in sin with dark eyed mysterious Italian shepherd type she's been trysting with up the mountain.

Lady C renounces her title and wealth finding true authenticity as a deck chair attendant

Mrs Fisher realises she's living in the 20th century and spontaneusly combusts.

Rose fades into the wallpaper.

The men all go down the pub.

mummycat1 · 24/02/2009 20:57

Hello - I think that the book was thoroughly enjoyable; the more you got into it, the more you got into it. It was brilliant escapism.

The balance between lemon vinegar and cream puff was just right for me too. I loved the way that Lotty launched herself into a new friendship like that - it's something I think we all fancy doing sometimes, but are too reserved to do. Even when you meet someone new who you get on with, you often let that slide away.

The ladies had no names or sense of self until they arrived at San Salvatore. They were only known by their married names, or in Scrap's case by her formal title, and were trapped and lost in England. But this was not, as I first suspected, an attack on men. There was room for them too in San Salvatore.

San Salvatore represented a feminine utopia of communal living where there is no one dominant leader, but rather a commune where everything is shared and all are welcomed and embraced.

Naturally as a utopia it had to be beautiful. I enjoyed the descriptions of the medieval castle and gardens, and feel that there was the right amount of description, but can see that some may feel that it was over the top - but isn't this afterall what a utopia is?

I have read "Elizabeth's German Garden" recently. This is more about vivid descriptions of a garden than anything else, and charts a period in Elizabeth Von armin's life. I think we can conclude from these two books, that Von Armin rather liked gardens!

The garden was the main focus of "The Enchanted April" too, more than the castle that they originally sort. The surrounding countryside played a role aswell. The women were able to go back to their feminine roots and find themselves in nature, which they are ultimately linked to.

The book was written in the 1920s when people were still in shock after the hideous fallout of WW1. Writing like this was popuar because people needed something comforting and beautiful to escape in. Interestingly, the war is only mentioned once (I think) and then this is brief. Men and women, at this time were trying to find and redefine themselves. It struck me that Rose and Lotty have no children, but have been married for some time and then lost their way in there relationships. Perhaps their husbands were away in the war for some time?

Please don't mind me rattling on - I'm really enjoying myself and could keep going all night

There's still Mrs Fisher and Lady C to talk about yet...

morningpaper · 24/02/2009 21:01

hmmm vv interesting, do go on

agree about feminine utopia - it just needed a jacuzzi and more gin and I'd be there in a flash

TillyBookClub · 24/02/2009 21:01

Hurrah for throwing the husbands into the sea. I felt they didn't really deserve their open armed embrace, though the women did deserve one (and they wanted it with the husbands, so I guess that's that).

The setting reminded me so much of The Talented Mr Ripley that I did keep expecting something weird and sinister to happen.

Looking upthread I realise I sound rather negative about the book which isn't how I felt when reading it at all. I think it holds you in a warm blanket spell and only afterwards, back in the real world, do you feel like criticising..

It is a blessed relief to read a happy dreamy book, lets face it.

Perhaps the difficulty is that you cant quite see why the women loved their men in the first place, even if they do go through a process of transformation and self-recognition.

OP posts: