@DreamyLemonBiscuit A while ago but the dynamics have played out the same in all the boys schools who have approached the coed situation this way over the years. A small minority of girls (>10%) means they get an disproportionate amount of attention (positive and negative) and it’s not healthy for anyone, boys or girls.
In terms of facilities and opportunities I don’t mean a shiny new conference facility boarding house (still not finished and long overdue, as for the last few years day girls’ have been given a few desks shoved together in a side room in a boys house), but that the range of things girls can do is not equivalent to those of boys, despite fees being exactly the same. For example, one of the staff told me that they don’t need to provide lacrosse, netball or hockey for girls as they are perfectly happy with cross country, the gym or no sport at all. (How convenient!) They don’t get the same opportunities for inter-school sport, as there are not enough of them to make up teams even if they had the right facilities and coaching, and also do not have the same opportunities to participate in inter-house competition which is a huge part of boarding school life. And of course, they are still not allowed in until 16 because of their sex so have missed out on the common academic grounding that most of the boys have.
But the worst thing is that girls at these schools are gaslighted into believing that it is a fabulous honour and privilege to be one of the elite few at last allowed in to the boys club, and so they put up with behaviours and situations that that would be completely unacceptable anywhere else.
My view: if a school wants to go co-ed, do it thoroughly and quickly. Whole school, aiming for 50/50 asap, and (if you want to charge the same fees for everyone) equal investment in all areas from the start.