Hi, I'm someone who was upset by this post, though I appreciate that you didn't intend it that way.
My second daughter was stillborn at 37 weeks, nearly five months ago. I probably held the view that a 'stillbirth' wasn't that bad, until it happened to me.
I like the phrase "my baby may have been stillborn, but was 'still' born".
Like every other heavily pregnant woman, I went into hospital with a large bump, and left with a smaller (though saggy) tummy. I had to deliver my DD (in my case via EMCS when induction failed), I still had a baby to hold, a baby to look at, yet she wasn't breathing, she wasn't moving - she was lifeless. I'm sure you can appreciate that if you've had children, the idea of holding your baby, but having a lifeless, non-breathing infant is in fact horrific.
I still produced milk, still had my 6 week postnatal check-up, had midwife visits for 14 days. I had to recover from a caesarean, whilst attending a funeral directors to arrange her funeral. When I should have been dressing her in her coming home outfit, I was dressing her in her funeral outfit.
I've posted this after your broadcast, as I know that you specifically wanted to hear from mothers with older children, but I get upset that 'stillbirth' (a word I hate), is almost a dirty secret, not understood - not helped by the media who frequently get it wrong.
I hope you found the resources you were looking for, but please don't think that having a stillborn baby is an 'easy' loss. If you look on my profile you'll see that DD2 was certainly a real baby.