'gets down to mumbar's level' "It's unnaceptable"!
I don't mean to be po-faced about her but I object for several reasons.
The main being that the programme (which is the driver for selling the books) is so totally against producer guidelines, so deeply unethical and misleadingly edited and filmed. My DH is a television producer and has told me what goes on in these programmes (goading families, telling them to sleep deprive their kids or wind them up in order to film their worst behaviour and edit it so it looks like good behaviour after the techniques are employed.
I am actually disgusted that they film kids who cannot consent to be filmed in their worst light for entertainment. Can you imagine being 18 and remembering that your tantrums and awful behaviour was filmed so that people could basically gasp at it? And you had no say in the matter. And that the producers engineered it so that you were made to look even worse than you were in reality (sleep deprivation, taking toys away, having a disruptive film crew in your house).
Also, her methods are draconian. I mean, weaning a 2.9 year old demand feeder/co-sleeper off the boob in 2 nights? No psychologist would advise that swift a change.
She doesn't really tackle the underlying problems behind the behaviour. It's simple behaviour modification stuff which may work (and is obviously edited to show it has 'worked') in the short term but doesn't address the deeper issues.
She's a nanny. Not a parent. She doesn't have children so cannot really empathise.
This is not to say that some of these techniques aren't common sense. I don't object to her as a person, she seems warm and kind to children and does advise quality time with children which is common sense.
But she ain't having my schilling.