...because i didn't ...and then i felt quite bad about it
I have always swore to never go down the "you will eat all your meal or you never in leave the table for the next 10 years" route, but really don't want to go down the 'making everyone in the family a different meal to eat' route either.
So, basically, i made the meal, the dc's refused to eat it, dh and I ate it and we all left the table.
DC's wanted an alternative but i refused to provide it. They were allowed to eat fruit if they were still hungry but i didn't cook another meal. It felt the right thing to do at the time, but now i'm not sure if i've been a little harsh??
Should i have made them a different meal?
Dc's are 8 and 5 btw. My 14 month old ate all hers