Please or to access all these features

Behaviour/development

Talk to others about child development and behaviour stages here. You can find more information on our development calendar.

No end in sight for harmful flame retardants in our furniture

33 replies

jennymor123 · 02/10/2016 11:10

I want to let everyone know that civil servants are preventing changes to the law which would greatly reduce levels of flame retardants in our furniture.

Hundreds of studies show that flame retardants get into house dust, then into our children's blood and mother's breast milk. They can have severely detrimental effects on a child's development. FRs also cause cancers, thyroid problems and other illnesses. Our sofas and mattresses are stuffed with them.

UK homes have very high levels of FRs due in large part to the requirements of the Furniture and Furnishings (Fire) (Safety) Regulations. Two years ago, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (now called BEIS), published proposals to change the 'match test' in the FFRs. The match test, as it's name suggests, means furniture cover fabrics must not ignite after being exposed to a match flame. This proposal would have cut FRs in cover fabrics by up to 50% overnight and opened the door to new technology that would have quickly eliminated them altogether. Furniture would actually also have been safer from fire (for reasons too complicated to go into here).

The USA changed its furniture laws in 2014, after huge pressure from firefighters (who get more cancers than normal, in the UK too), green scientists, the Chicago Tribune and consumers. Now, US furniture does not need to contain any flame retardants.

In the UK, however, the chemical industry worked on weak-willed civil servants at BEIS and the new test was put on hold.

This, despite BEIS's research having proved that the current match test doesn't work in most cases anyway! Think about that: retailers are selling you sofas stuffed with toxic FRs that aren't even preventing fires as they're supposed to. Worse still, when a sofa catches light, within a very short space of time these FRs give off large amounts of carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide (one of the deadliest poisons).

For two years BEIS officials tried to justify their delays by looking for changes they could make to the proposed new test. They failed. A couple of weeks ago, they re-released proposals that are exactly the same as those published two years ago. But there's a catch. In order to cover their backs, they've included other changes to the rest of the FFRs that are unworkable. This guarantees further delays to the new match test, by at least another year but more like several more years.

In the meantime, people are continuing to die in furniture fires that aren't supposed to happen and we're all at risk from cancers from excessive FR dust in our homes.

In the US, consumers lobbied Macy's until the store promised to stop selling furniture containing FRs. In the UK, unfortunately, all our major retailers continue to poison us, knowing their sofas are ignitable anyway.

OP posts:
makermom · 04/10/2018 19:12

I've read that site. Still can't believe most people here are doing NOTHING. Have these chemical companies seen what is happening to Monsanto? Please let me know if you hear of any actions and if there is anything I can do. Letter writing?

jennymor123 · 05/10/2018 15:07

I suggest you write to the site's author via the site. There are people trying to do something about this. I know a delegation is meeting the Business Minister soon to urge him to bring in the necessary changes. A series of Parliamentary Questions recently (from Lady Mar if you want to look them up on Hansard) revealed the lattice of lies and evasions that BEIS officials are currently using to conceal their utter ineptitude about keeping the public safe. One cracker is where they say that the Regulations do not require manufacturers to use flame retardants. Which is true but what they aren't saying is a) the cost of a compliant sofa without FRs is around £3000 and b) BEIS itself proved the regulations don't work anyway, meaning there is no need for FRs in the first place!

I can't believe nothing is happening either. But I can believe industry will lose a lot of money if not custom, and a government department will be seriously embarrassed, if the law is put right. It really does need a rise in public consciousness. That's what happened in the US and which played a big part in their law changing to get rid of FRs in their furniture.

OP posts:
MiniMum97 · 06/11/2018 18:52

@makermom @jennymor123
I have de-FR'd my bedroom but have been defeated and relenting and buying FR covered sofas. It's depressing but I have chronic illness and am too tired and just need a new sofa. I am concerned that the old ones are deteriorating and leaching old super toxic FRs so think new ones from ikea are likely to be a better bet.
I am angry and disgusted that I basically have no choice in this. I should be able to choose whether to have this shit in my home!
Has there been any movement on a campaign I can get on the back of? Why is no-one in the UK shouting about this? I don't understand it. Americans are all over it! Has anyone approached any of the organisations that have been campaigning in the US to see if they can assist with a campaign here?

mamush · 09/11/2018 20:36

Thanks jennymor123 for updating us on this issue in such detail. I've worked in food campaigning and know what an endless struggle it is to get toxic chemicals banned from use in the foods we eat let alone from the furniture we sit and sleep on.

We now need to get a replacement sofabed mattress for our living room as its totally worn out but I can't bring myself to buy a replacement from the Futon Company where we got it originally as it caused my skin to itch for several weeks after buying it every time I sat on it and I'm sure it contains lots of FRCs though have not asked them what sort. We now have 3 kids and I feel very sad that we probably all have these chemicals in our bodies now. Last year I was disgnosed with an autoimmune thyroid disease which I now realise those chemicals may well have contributed to.

Do you still recommend Cambridge Natural Mattreses as you did in a related thread in 2016? They make sofabeds that look similar to ours but I think are FRC free.

MiniMum97 · 09/11/2018 21:00

I bought 2 mattresses from cottonsafe mattresses (same company as Cambridge I understand) and am very happy with them. Excellent quality. I didn't buy futon mattresses but I did try their futon mattresses at their showroom and they seemed very good. They do one that has springs which was very comfortable.

And all definitely FR free!

anxiousman · 10/11/2018 14:53

This research is really quite scary. It just goes to show, how the government doesn't have the best interests of its people sadly.

worldwide89 · 30/05/2019 20:26

Hi. I’m new to mumsnet. I appreciate this thread has been dormant a while but this is an issue that really that concerns me with young children in the house. I wish we could choose not to have these chemicals in our homes. Does anyone have any info about availability of flame retardant (and other chemical) free furniture in the U.K.? Many suppliers seem very expensive and there is obviously speculation that they may be using flame retardants and simply saying they aren’t. I see IKEA now do a natural mattress called the Hidrasund but I assume it is still treated with flame retardants since it doesn’t say it isn’t!

Interestingly ikea provide info on their website to say that in certain countries they have to use flame retardants (specifying U.K. and US). Does this mean one could theoretically make a trip to ikea in France and get flame retardant free furniture?!

Calledyoulastnightfromglasgow · 28/09/2019 07:40

Sorry to jump on an old thread.

I believe that nothing has changed still. I have been thinking about levels of breast cancer in the UK. Younger and younger people affected. Most people trust regulations and government. It makes me so cross.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page