I neither agree not disagree with your pov hulababy but the ADHD issue continues to intrigue me.
I am largely ignorant of many of the facts, but I have done a bit of research on the subject.
Have you read the pampered child syndrome by Maggie Mamen? I read that and was even more confused but it does raise the question of how many genuine cases of ADHD actually exist.
Thing is, the diagnostic criteria will validate many a child's diagnosis for ADHD from a symptomatic perspective but what of the conditions that created the condition.
One could argue that certain parenting styles create a propensity toward ADHD - does this make the diagnosis less genuine, and is the condition less real if it can be avoided?
I suppose it's like saying that a man who smokes 40 a day, and drinks with his steak and chips every night whilst watching the football has less genuine coronary failure than the footballer teetotaller with the same condition. That doesn't make sense to me, but I do struggle with the prevalence issue around ADHD because I believe that a large number of children could be spared the condition if we could tackle issues such as self esteem which I believe are at the very heart of our national (perhaps Western worldwide) emotional and behavioural health.
However, I also believe that once ADHD ebhaviours are expressed by the child, then diagnosis can be very positive for many. I also believe that you can treat such a condition without specific diagnosis by focusing on support. Sometimes the diagnosis medicalises to the extent that real support becomes even harder to obtain.
I'm not sure, what do you think of my thinking?