Thanks again Arfen. I followed your link and it is clear.
I know I can't appeal as firstly there's a deadline which is long gone and no point of the law was wrong. Apparently as first thing I wanted to do was look at this avenue.
As far as the Judge goes who handled my case, I am not satisfied that the welfare checklist took into account any emotional attachment my son has with me considering I was his primary carer prior. It was too black and white.
Firstly he discounted my DS's understanding of the temporary arrangement coming to an end where my DS was in effect 'counting down' to joining me full time and he was reassured by me and school of this regularly.
His wishes were the basis of it being arranged! (My DS's old school has a letter I sent them outlining the temp arrangement with dates etc).
In addition to this I have a letter from my exs solicitor saying he was happy for DS to join me full time and reside with me at the end of term as agreed as long as I could confirm certain points - which I did via a letter from my solicitor. I agreed to everything he wanted. After confirmation of this my ex went quiet, obstructed contact, lied that my son was ill (kept him off school) when I was due to collect him from school (2 incidents logged with the police) and the next thing I knew was I had a Court summons. Not all of the above evidence was submitted last time. I blame my solicitor. She seemed to have too many cases on and not enough time.
I can't understand how the judge could believe that he had apparently said he'd put the idea to me about the arrangement and his tale of abandonment. I was collecting my son every weekend and my ex was still paying me maintenance into my bank account for our DS well into the temp arrangement. (Evidence of the maintenance payments weren't submitted) and for me you have to ask the question why would he be paying me maintenance if I'd apparently abandoned my DS?
The main failing to me was the fact my DS's voice wasn't heard so wasn't taken into account AT ALL. The problem I have with this is the Judge even said 'if the child's wishes and feelings had been heard he would more than likely have come to the same decision'.
I found that very difficult to accept and a very cold comment. I mean how can you discount what a child wants! Now I am witnessing the consequences and my son has been emotionally harmed through this bad judgement.
I apparently have 2 routes...
1, Vary the order and have actual dates and times applied as ex being obstructive and wields the court order like some invisible weapon which is impacting now on pre-set arrangements / routine not being present for my son which in turn is causing more turmoil for him as he doesn't know when he is next going to see me. It's disruptive and unhealthy for my DS.
In addition to this he is causing me stress and worry and as I've stated already that this is personal and unfair. He has refused mediation continually for the last 2 weeks to resolve things including the half term we're currently on. In his last email he simply said my DS will be available from midday on Weds but did not say where I'm to collect him from and nothing was said about how long or when my ex will collect him.
Or 2,
Look to have the order reversed in its entirety based on the serious welfare concerns I have based on the above and being untruthful about medical matters and obstructing a hospital appointment (which caused my son pain and suffering) and obstructing additional (outside school) educational support plus have a section 7 report or section 37 report based on how my son feels. The social worker felt the obstruction and lack of support was disgraceful and no parent in their right mind would behave like this. This said my solicitor said this would have to be detailed and documented in a report to have any weight.
I feel like I have a strong case, but I get the impression my solicitor doesn't (as she's obviously seen more cases etc go back to court) or maybe I'm just so unjustly dissatisfied that my child and I have been failed. The Mediation service have already said they are happy to sign a new court application in my favour so I want to strike whilst the iron is hot and show how unreasonable my ex is.
Social services said there has to be a clear distinction on a new application not being seen as being disappointed with the last outcome or myself and my ex looking like bickering parents.
I can also prove he was untruthful in Court last year (and was untruthful about me (and have evidence)) and so can discredit him. Surely (my mind keeps telling me) that this should justifiably be enough!? If he can be untruthful about medical matters etc... and I have evidence...
The picture he painted through untruths last year would be reviewed... Plus as mentioned in your link I think a different Judge would have come to a different decision. I know the Judge at the first hearing was completely outraged that he'd prevented contact with my DS for a month whilst holding a temporary order.
Until I hear from my Barrister I just don't what my options are if any.
All I do know is that I have told the truth throughout and I am really angry that unsubstantiated mud slinging in his statement was considered more serious and taken as fact than my truthful child focused supportive one.
Social services said that I have to have a 'bottom line' of what is acceptable to me for my child. To outline key points and failings of the last six months (since the final hearing) and how this falls short from how things were for my son.
Since the Court ruling I have also collected my ds from his new school and he's been wearing dirty clothes (in one case all week) and has had dirty long finger and toe nails on more than one occasion. His toenails were actually growing over the end of his toes and were all curved. Shocking and disgraceful. Everything is well below my standards of care and appearance for my child. Not convinced
my exs girlfriend is supporting him emotionally either as she is busy with her own child plus there's their turbulent relationship.
I'm favouring option 2 as I am worried all the time about my sons level of care and cannot trust anything my ex tells me now. I want to also go armed with a more about able level of contact to my ex (unrestricted phone calls, tea times, extra days when he likes). I AM A FAIR PERSON... This is about our child's best interests.
I just feel caught in the system now and it's still all in the hands of the Gods. It shouldn't be this hard.
I feel the section 7 or section 37 - Is an essential accompaniment to my case especially as it may be 'reserved' for the original Judge to return. I would quiver in my shoes just to see him again.
So the moral to the tale is... When you are unemployed, stuff your child's education and move them. Don't ask their father to step up (where he never had) so they can finish their school year or he'll betray you in the worse way you can imagine.
Hindsight.