just curious really as i have twin boys aged 3.1 and the gap between what they know and how quickly they learn is becoming really obvious
i know all children develop and learn at different paces and times and you shouldnt compare, but its hard not to compare twins when you are raising two children exactly the same age at the same time!!
i suppose what i am looking for is a bit of reassurance that the one who is 'behind' (very poor choice of word) is still withing the range of normal / average
He can count to 10 by memory and knows his colours and basic shapes and he knows maybe 6 or 7 letters by sight. he knows 's' and 'z' for example and will point at a 'z' and say z for zebra. He doesnt know any numbers by sight though and doesnt seem to have any concept of counting objects yet.
His brainy brother knows 90% of his alphabet by sight and all his numbers 1-10. he can count to 20 and can count objects, so will look at say 6 apples and point to each in turn and count correctly to 6. He just picks things up so quickly, he is really sharp.
Am not a pushy parent btw, just a first time mum who doesnt really have a clue how much my lo's should typically know at this age. they are both good little talkers and talk equally well