I took my DS to the optician for a routine eye test. I wanted to rule out any problems with long sightedness/squint as he is struggling with writing and a little with reading. Close up, everything is absolutely fine, no concerns with lazy eye or squint but it turns out he is mildly short sighted. His prescription is -.50 in each eye, although I think they put one up to -.75 as it seemed to make it easier for him in the test.
I am shortsighted and so is DS's father, both very mild, one of my eyes is also only -.50. I wear glasses or contact lenses but would never bother if my prescription was as mild as DS in both eyes. I can't help feeling that this is an over reaction and rather unnecessary.
Can anyone else tell me of experiences with a mildly shortsighted child and if glasses dramatically improved their life or were just a menace?
Is glasses for such a mild prescription normal? Kids with glasses when I was growing up really couldn't see without them. I never wore glasses until I was 18 or 19, I don't remember having a proper eye test before then either.