DD and I walk to school almost every day. In order to get her out of the house in a timely fashion, and to instill a bit of "hurry up" in her leisurely pace, we've taken to playing a little game. There are one or two children who are always at school early, so we've started playing a "let's see if we can get to school before Amy and Elizabeth" game. They set the standard for timeliness with their prompt arrivals, and we try to meet or exceed it.
Last week we entered the classroom, and saw that indeed we had arrived before the other two children. DD and I laughed and had a bit of a low key "cheer" that we had arrived first. DD's teacher looked at me and said "what is this trying to beat the other children business"? I laughed and explained to her that it is simply a game we play as a way of hurrying along to school, and that we admire the other children for being so consistently early in their arrivals. She then said "it doesn't matter who gets here first". I was taken aback, and even felt a bit chastised, because our game is not intended in any sort of mean spirited way. (I agree it would be mean if we cheered about arriving ahead of the slowest ones).
I thought about this quite a bit because, of course, I don't want to make another child feel badly. But, I thought the teacher was overly PC to condemn our game. We weren't gloating, or making the other child unhappy....at least, not that I'm aware of. Is our game insensitve, in your opinion?
As a larger issue, personally I think it's good to introduce a bit of competitiveness in a positive way - especially if it is lighthearted (and also as dd is an only child this is a lesson she doesn't get at home). After all, the world is a competitive and aggressive place. How do you instill these qualities in your children in a healthy and appropriate way....or do you?