Hi again Sara - Georgia Olivia! Lovely (as long as your surname doesn't start with a D! Or A,B,N,R,S,T or V...sorry I had to point that out in case you hadn't considered it!)
I came up with my favourite 3 names to go with Harry - Rose (Rosie), Ruby and Lucy. I also like Charlotte, Ella, Tara and Sophie.
My question is this: Do you think it is more unkind to give a child a "common" name, or an unusual one? Obviously you need to wary of initials and probable nicknames...my dh actually works with a guy named Richard Brain. No lie. Can you imagine what HE got called at school?!
There seem to be more unusual girls names around...I managed to find 20 of each (the ones with asterisks are names of children I know!)
GIRLS: Amethyst, Magenta, Essence, Caris/Caresse, Alisandra, Flame, Kalinda, Mirella, Chenae, Shae, Jessamyn, Gracemaree, Gypsy, Brooklynn, Taryn, Summer, Skyla, Paris, Kiara and Cherilyn*.
BOYS: Henley, Kai, Bayley/Bailey, Kaiden, Blaise, Jurien, Jamen/Jaymen, Kelby, Radley, Reed/Reid, Selby, Sturt, Torryn/Torren, Tynan, Ty, Denham, Reyne, Rourke, Denver, Darcy.
So is it "better" to have an unusual or original name? Or does it just make you crazy having to spell it all the time if it is tricky or spelt differently (like Jorga/Jorja or Mikeal). Is it easier to have a more commonly known name? Does it mean less teasing? Or doesn't it make a difference? Feedback please!!!
PS By the way, Cherilyn is Cher's real name...and mine too... and yes I do get tired of spelling it (and everyone always starts it with an "S"!)