Hi,
I may well be jumping the gun a bit here, as we have not had our second scan yet so don't know what we are having... but I have a feeling we're going to have a boy this time....
Anyway, DH's first name has been used for at least the last 5 generations of men in his family.
The tradition for the first born oldest son is to have this particular name (not giving the name as it's not the name itself i want opinions on).
Anyway, the first name combined with the surname sound slightly, (but not overly) comical.
For example think along the lines of Edward Woodward.
My husband has always said he would want to name a son with the same name, as it is his family tradition.
Then last week out of the blue he suddenly said that he doesn't want to do that anymore.
He said that he got fed up as a kid and still now of people saying "you're parents must have had a sense of humour - ha ha" or something similar when they hear his name and thinks it may be time for a stop to the tradition.
I had always accepted that if we have a boy, there would be no name "choosing" as I know that it is an important family tradition, plus I actually like the first name in question. Although to be honest I would find it weird that there would be 4 generations of the family alive at the same time with the same name.
So, my question is, if we don't go with the family name do you think DH will live to regret it and wish he had followed the tradition?
Like I said, might be jumping the gun, but just have a feeling....
Don't want to discuss this with the inlaws as I suspect they will think I have put ideas into his head.
Thanks for reading this long post.