Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Baby names

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Paul - views please

46 replies

Playdough · 27/09/2008 17:57

Six weeks to go until due date and DH and I really struggling for a boy's name. Our short list is all over the place but one that I keep coming back to is Paul. But is it too 60s/70s? Or is it due for a revival, perhaps? We like short, classic names as we have an unusual and quite difficult to spell surname. So what do MNetters think?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
onepieceoflollipop · 27/09/2008 21:21

Like it, it is my brother's name. However I do tend to favour quite "middle of the road" names iykwim.

Easy to spell, no one says "ooh that's unusual" but everyone has heard of it and there aren't currently loads of little boys named Paul.

moondog · 27/09/2008 21:22

Dreadful

ninah · 27/09/2008 21:26

Not for me ...

ButterflyBessie · 27/09/2008 21:26

Dull, dull, dull

What about John?

pointydog · 27/09/2008 21:31

due for a revival

Beauregard · 27/09/2008 21:31

Sorry dont like it

mummyloveslucy · 27/09/2008 21:34

dull and dated, sorrry.

TurkeyLurkey · 27/09/2008 21:35

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooo.

Don't do it.

Mutt · 27/09/2008 21:37

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Playdough · 27/09/2008 21:40

Butterfly Bessie, I do like John (predictably!) but it's the name of a significant ex-boyfriend so, not unreasonably, DH has vetoed it . The easy to spell bit is important as our surname always needs spelling and usually elicits the response: oh, that's an unusual name, where's it from? (To which I have no answer ... must get on Who Do You Think You Are?) It's good to get lots of views, and to know how for how many of you it is just a dull name. That's what I'd worry about: my sister has never really liked her name and has always slightly held it against our parents.

OP posts:
Spidermama · 27/09/2008 21:42

I really like the name Paul. Always have. None of them around nowadays either so it would be nice and uncommon.

Szyslak · 27/09/2008 21:48

Paul is lovely. Simple, classic and currently not very popular. Is therefore ripe for a revival, you could lead the way!

I like John too, for the same reason (and like Johnny)

and Andrew.

AbbeyA · 27/09/2008 21:59

I don't know why it isn't popular at the moment-I think it is lovely. Due for a revival.(I love the names people often call boring or dull!)

Szyslak · 27/09/2008 22:05

The female equivalent would be 'Sarah' I think.

AbbeyA · 27/09/2008 22:07

Sarah is my favourite girl's name!

Szyslak · 27/09/2008 22:10

Tis loevly.

LynetteScavo · 27/09/2008 22:10

No, no it's Steven and Sarah!

Sorry, not keen on Paul.

dibdabscribble · 28/09/2008 09:16

Would Saul be an option?

Scotia · 28/09/2008 09:31

I like it.

Playdough · 28/09/2008 15:46

Thanks for all the views. I think we'll be definitely using Paul for one of the names (maybe with Edward?). It was great to get so much feedback.

OP posts:
lolianja · 28/09/2008 15:49

I love it.

My other half is a Paul, and if he weren't I'd strongly consider it for a little boy. I'm recently turned 20 and there were dozens of Pauls at school of around my age, and I know quite a few Pauls of 16/17 but that's where the usage seems to tail off a bit. Don't know too many little Pauls. Time for a revival!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread