Which is more timeless, Sarah or Emily?

[hcarter8]

I like nonsense names that are easy to spell and pronounce but I am struggling to find a truly timeless name.

my partner likes Emily, I know Emily was very popular 20 years ago so could have the possibility of sounding dated on a baby today even though it’s only number 28 on the ONS and even though Sarah was very popular in the 70s it feels more classic to me for some reason. On the ONS Sarah had never fallen out of the top 100 until 2021 but Emily did for about 60 years and then became popular in the 90s and 2000s.

thoughts?

I prefer Emily to Sarah. I grew up in the 80’s and we had 4 Sarah’s in our class. Had to call them by their full names as 2 of them had the same initials.

My Grandmother, born in 1906, was an Emily. DH’s Grandmother, born in 1908 was Sarah. So both classic names. I love a classic.

Personally (born 2001) Emily is a lot more timeless than Sarah.

I know a couple of Emily’s spread over different ages, however I do not know a Sarah younger than 35.

They are both classic and timeless but I'd Sarah was extremely popular in the 70s and 80s whereas Emily has been much more popular in the 90s and noughties than before or since.

You would be more likely to have 4 Emilys in your class today.

I think Emma is more classic than Emily. They are both classic names but Emily has had strong trends in the last 25 years in the way that Emma hasn't. I think Emma is like Elizabeth in that you don't hear it and immediately picture someone in a specific age range. With Sarah and Emily I definitely do do that.

I like nonsense names that are easy to spell and pronounce but I am struggling to find a truly timeless name.

I take it you meant to type 'no nonsense'. There are loads of truly classic names, but that's not to say they won't occasionally pick up massively in popularity for a decade or so, then dip back into relative obscurity but still be considered a classic. When I was a child no-one except people's grandads were called George or William or Harry or Charlie. Very, very few people my own age were called that, whereas James is the epitome of a true classic that never goes out of use or style. Now there are tons of young people called William, George and Henry and Charles. They are all classic names but ones that fell out of popularity in the 50's 60s, 70's and 80s, then had a resurgence in the 90s and ever since.

For girls I think true classics that are pretty hard to date irrespective of the occasional popularity spike are:

Anna, Emma, Elsa, Erin, Erica, Ellen, Eleanor, Lara, Tara, Vanessa, Rachel, Hannah, Sarah, Sara, Kate, Esther, Eve, Elizabeth, Imogen, Martha, Catherine, Victoria, Isobel, Abigail, Rebecca, Phillipa, Zoe, Nicole, Jennifer, Rose, Verity, Annabel, Penelope, Phoebe, Charlotte, Diana.

Yes. I suspect baby Alan and baby Keith are a bit hard to find. Names are definitely generational. However baby Gertrude and baby Adelaide and Bertha are not often revived.

im nearly 70 and went to school with a few George, William and Henry’s. Mostly names that ran in families. Paul, Brian, Keith, John, Alan, Philip, Roger, Stephen, Peter and Michael were popular after ww2.

I would say Sarah, since it was mentioned in the Bible.

Emily is said to be Roman.

Nicole? Jennifer? Erin? Diana?

They fall into the known but not popular names. They are not timeless and certainly not classic.

Not really. It is a a derivative of Amelia which is the Latin Amal.

Between the two, I would say that Sarah is more timeless but they are both very classic and enduring names.
Other classic British names would be things like Elizabeth, Emma, Ann, Mary. There are plenty of others that have been used regularly for centuries.

Emily is timeless and beautiful. Personally I think Sarah is more dated and simple.

Sarah is more timeless. Emily has been around long enough but has phases of being more fashionable. Sarah has produced diminutives eg Sadie, Sally which are names in their own right now, suggesting it's been around a long time. I can think of Sarahs of quite different ages from 70s down to children (as a teacher).
I like them both.

I feel the same and I've no idea why.

Both are timeless (teacher of 25+ years and both have been names throughout but not overly popular). Both Lovely.
personally I prefer Sara (S-are-a) to Sarah (s-air-a) but then I am a Little Princess fan!

Emily is consistently in the Top Five Girls Names, where I live.

I think Sarah is a beautiful name, popular in my generation.

I think emily has phases, so could sound dated.

sarah is timeless

They're both lovely names. I prefer Sarah. Emily is too similar to the many Mia Mia Millie Ellie names that are popular now.

I mean they both are, Sarah slightly more so I suppose, and it seems to be returning a little

Timeless in the sense that their popularity waxes and wanes over time.

For example my grandmother, born in the 1880s, was Emily, so for my mother’s and then my generation it was an old-fashioned, frumpy name. And her mother was Sarah, known as Sally, because Sarah seemed so dated 150 years ago.

Years later both beautiful names became popular again.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that timeless doesn’t really come into it, so pick what you love, as perceptions change all the time.

Sarah has such a beautiful sound and would be quite refreshing on a child born now. It would stand out among the Avas, Islas and Olivias.

I think both are timeless. I maybe inch more towards Emily. But Sarah is maybe less common but also timeless.

I'd say Sarah is ancient and historical so definitely classic but it had a recent period of huge overexposure (mid- late last century) so feels a bit less timeless.

Emily is very well known but more of a steady popularity.

Emily is the obvious answer as Sarah may be a bit soon to feel truly evenly distributed again.

Maybe something biblical and strong like Meredith, Ruth, Abigail, or Susannah? So well known but not quite as well known?