Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Baby names

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Can Jack be a nickname for Jonathan?

38 replies

bluebabydinosaur · 09/02/2018 07:05

I know Jack is a nickname for John but do you think that Jack can be a nickname for Jonathan or is that too much of a stretch? Your thoughts would be appreciated. Many thanks

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
lemonsquisher · 09/02/2018 08:00

John F. Kennedy was also known as Jack!

LizardMonitor · 09/02/2018 08:15

These days no one gets to know someone called John and then starts to call them Jack as a natural progression.

Not in the same way Peter and David will be shortened to Pete and Dave.

So if you fancy Jack as a day to day name just use it from the off, even if birth certificate name is. Jonathon.

If you use Jonathan, kids in school might shorten it to anything from ‘J’ to Jonno or Jon. You might have to introduce ‘Jonty’.

TheCatsPaws · 09/02/2018 08:18

No. Jonathan is a lovely name why shorten it to “jack”?

WhenLoveAndCakeCollide · 09/02/2018 13:53

John and Jonathan do not share the same root name, and they are not basically the same name. They are not comparable to Sophie/Sophia, for example, which are clearly from the same roots.

John comes from Iohannes, the Latin form of Ioannes, which is the Grek form of the Hebrew name Yochanan. It means God is gracious.

Jonathan comes from Ionathan, which is a Latin and Greek form of the Hebrew name Yehonatan (or simplified as Yonatan). It means God has given.

Any source which says they share the same roots, are incorrect, but hey, I'm a Hebrew speaker, so what do I know?!

To give examples of names which do share the same Hebrew roots, James and Jacob do, as do Mary and Miriam.

iklboo · 09/02/2018 13:59

Jack is a nickname for John. My uncle Jack is John on his birth certificate but has been Jack all his like.

iklboo · 09/02/2018 14:00

Sorry - x post about a million people!

Purplehammer · 09/02/2018 14:34

Nicknames don’t have to have any connection with a given name.
My nickname was Spike.
My ex-FIL was registered as Henry he was always called Bill!

MikeUniformMike · 09/02/2018 15:59

John and Jonathan do not have the same root, but Jonathan and Nathan do.
Jack traditionally is a nn for John, but can also be a form of James. Jacqueline is the feminine form of James.

If you are going to call the baby Jack, you might as well put Jack on the bc.

Buxbaum · 09/02/2018 16:22

Happy to be corrected by an expert, Cake, but why the sarcasm? Just own your expertise.

lemonsquisher · 09/02/2018 16:46

John and Jonathan strangely don’t share the same root, hence why Jack can be a nickname for John (although it’s not widely used these days) but isn’t usually for Jonathan.

Regarding John -> Jack, happy to be corrected but I believe it goes all the way back to the Norman conquest and a lot of back and forth between Old French and Old English.

John was Jen in Old French, or Jan in Old Dutch. In Old English ‘kin’ was used an affectionate suffix (similarly to how we’d use ‘ie’ these days e.g. Jack became Jackie). So we have Jen or John becoming Jankin, which due to French pronunciation eventually becomes Jackin and somehow along the way is shortened to Jack.

Henry to Harry is a similarly dull tale!

MikeUniformMike · 09/02/2018 16:52

Not dull at all. Names are fascinating.

Sugarpiehoneyeye · 09/02/2018 17:26

No.

NotAnotherEmma · 09/02/2018 17:37

It's dumb enough that for some reason Jack is a nickname for John...

Why not just name him Jack? All the Jack's I've known have been great while the Jonathan's were pushover forgettable types.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread