sorry for your loss Norma and congrats on new pg!
for me I couldn't choose the same name as a first name, wouldn't mind as a second.
but it used to be quite common to reuse the name for the next in line after loosing a baby/young child.
DH has a family tree that goes back hundreds of years, it's fascinating.
there are families where there were 10- 13 children born but there'd be 4 Elizabeths and 3 Thomases for example!
When you looked at the birth/death dates it would become clear that sibling with the same name meant the older child/ren weren't alive at the point of the younger one/s birth date.
so however painful personally I wonder about the motivation behind this practice.
maybe the parents wanted to carry on traditional family names? or felt like their newest child somehow carries on the memory of the others by having the same name as a bittersweet reminder?
or some other reasons, legal perhaps?
I wonder why your husband would prefer to use the same name again, what's the emotion or reasoning behind his wish.
(genuine question, not attacking or criticising at all)
If you feel uneasy, but say he wants to honour the baby you lost, you both have very valid points so neither of you are right or wrong!
it's a very delicate issue and probably a very hard decision to make.
but my feeling is that one parent is very much against a name for whatever reason it's best to avoid that name at least as a first name.
I hope this is helpful