DS is due in a few weeks and my DH and I have a 'shortlist' of names we'll pick from once bubba is here and we've seen what he looks like.
The names we like are :
William
Miles
George
Edward (Ted)
Arthur
William, George and Arthur are all family names and we both like the idea of continuing the family tradition.
I love Peter but DH doesn't. He's also not so keen on Miles, but agrees that with our surname it's a strong sounding name.
I'm a bit unsure as our two favourites - William and George are quite popular. My DH has a common name (Tom) and he said it has never bothered him being one of many Tom's at work and at school. My name however is unusual and I like it, though can see the advantages of having a more widely known name thats easier to spell.
I do like the name Arthur, but I'm worried it's a little bit faddy and will seem outdated in a few years time.
I'd be interested to know what other people think? Anyone regret naming their child a very common name?
Any suggestions for alternatives we might not have thought of?