Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Baby names

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

5-syllable double barrel… too much?

6 replies

Burmama · 02/06/2014 10:17

The subject really says it all. I don't use my husband's name but we would really like our baby to use both. But is 5 syllables just too much to inflict on a newborn? Especially when they're going to have first and middle names as well?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
MrsWinnibago · 02/06/2014 11:44

My DC have a 6 syllable double barrel. It never occurred to me that the amount of syllables should affect our choice. It's too important a choice to allow this to affect it.

MrsWinnibago · 02/06/2014 11:45

What I did do was choose short first names and now they are at school they are often referred to as one name or the other...and sometimes as

Jo M-Wilkinson for example rather than Jo Molyneux-Wilkinson. (made up name by the way!)

squoosh · 02/06/2014 11:45

Nope, not too many at all. He's not going to realise his name is longer than other people's, it will just be his name.

indie123 · 02/06/2014 12:24

I know a couple who gave their child a 5 syllable surname and they feel fine about it. My daughter has a 4 syllable double barrell surname...if you want a 5 syllable surname then go for it. I would give a one or two syllable first name though. Hugh fearnley-whittingtstall has 5 syllable surname and i think his name is great

Burmama · 03/06/2014 06:02

Thanks all! We will go with it, it's a mouthful but you're right winnibago, too important to care. And I have short first names in mind anyway!

OP posts:
HamAndPlaques · 03/06/2014 18:02

The number of syllables is less important than the metre of the name, IMHO.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page