Please or to access all these features

Antenatal tests

Get updates on how your baby develops, your body changes, and what you can expect during each week of your pregnancy by signing up to the Mumsnet Pregnancy Newsletters.

1:580 for Downs Syndrome

11 replies

Katurah · 10/03/2017 19:30

Just had my screening results. Nuchal was 2.6mm (same as my DS1) and I'm 38. DS1 was 1:850 at 36.

Would you do a harmony test or am I over worrying?

Thanks 🙏🏼

OP posts:
Ecureuil · 10/03/2017 19:32

1:580 seems pretty low to me.
I didn't even get a risk factor, I was just told I was 'low risk' as it was less than 1:250

yousignup · 10/03/2017 19:35

DD is now 9 and hasn't got Down's Syndrome. We were given a 1:8 chance on all our scans; I was 38. We are not in the UK and I am not sure what a harmony test is, but we did no further testing and she is fine. I have no idea what to advise, but I know how stressful this must be for you, OP.

HN42 · 15/03/2017 18:39

Personally, I would not have had the NIPT with that result. I did because one twin was 1 in 85 chance but the harmony test came back clear. I think the odds you have been given is around the normal risk level for your age group and they are very good odds and I would have been reassured by that. Obviously its up to you, if it is going to play on your mind for the whole pregnancy it's worth paying to get a test done privately if it means its going to stop you worrying.

Count2three · 15/03/2017 18:47

For DC2 I had a 1:155 risk, which is believe is just outside the high risk category. Nuchal was 3.5. I was worried but opted to not further test, reasoning that it was low risk for a reason, despite being close. I was 35 at the time. He does not have any chromosome abnormalities.

NataliaOsipova · 15/03/2017 18:57

I would have the test. At least you then have the full picture. I can't remember what it "used to be", but I'm sure that the high risk cutoff point was changed to 1:250 in the time between my first and second pregnancies (ie you would have been considered high risk at a lower risk level previously, if that makes any sort of sense).

Please try not to worry - these tests are heavily weighted by your age and probability is very much on your side.

PollytheDolly · 15/03/2017 19:00

1:146 22 years ago aged 23. I refused further testing as amnio was more risky! I'd say yours is low x

Katurah · 15/03/2017 22:48

Thanks everyone. I hard the harmony tonight, not too worried. Looking forward to hopefully feeling reassured and finding out the gender!

OP posts:
PollytheDolly · 16/03/2017 04:56

Great. Keep us posted please.

sofato5miles · 16/03/2017 05:18

Was 1:2 with DS. Had a cvs and he looked fine. At 7 years is utterly NT.

Katurah · 23/03/2017 15:46

Just to update - results back on day 8. 1 in 10000 for all trisonomies and a baby girl! Feel very lucky xx

OP posts:
sunshine916 · 24/03/2017 16:27

That is great news, I have just been through the same thing a couple of weeks ago and was so relieved to get my Harmony test results back as low risk. Xx

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.