If you were at a child's party and a child there was being really aggressive to another one, and there were relatives of his there but they weren't doing much to stop him, the main child being picked on's mother wasn't there, and none of the other parents there were intervening, would you have done something about it?
I keep thinking how the child being picked on might have felt with nobody protecting him and feeling really guilty that I did nothing.
He didn't cry and seemed to be 'joining in' but the other child was mainly the one on top of him and kept chasing him to 'attack' him and the other one was running away and seemed to me more like he was trying to get away from him than doing it for fun.
I guess people would have thought it was the boy's relatives' job to stop him and that they would have got cross if someone else intervened, or maybe they thought the fighting wasn't that bad.
It seems obvious now that I should have asked the 'victim' if he was ok and if he was enjoying the fighting or wanted it to stop (I couldn't really tell). Or maybe this would have been the wrong thing as well?
And should I talk to the 'victim's' mother about being wary of leaving him at parties if the other one is going?
I don't know if I'm being oversensitive because of my own childhood stuff or not.