Hopefully this isn't too complicated and I really do want to know if IABU so all answers welcome!
I have two good friends, both have the same name which is a little confusing. One friend I have known for many years (frined 1) and it was through her I became good friends with the other friend (friend 2)
Recently friend 1 has accused friend 2 of something - in my opinion all a little silly - and they have had a huge falling out. I do beleive that the way in which friend 2 handled the whole situation was wrong - and that it could have been diffused, but it wasn't and now the friendship between them is over.
I see a lot of friend 1 due to our circumstances, and less of friend 2, so obviously have heard a lot more about friend 1's side of the argument than friend 2, but have maintained throughout that I do not want to be involved.
Other mutual friends have taken friend 1's side completely and no longer want anything to do with friend 2.
Friend 1 feels a bit upset that I have not ditched friend 2 - as she has treated her unfairly - and I think she is struggling with the fact that I intend to remain friends and will still see both her and her family.
So my question is am I being unreasonable not to have fully supported my friend 1 (who is my best friend) or is she being unreasonable expecting me to take her side in an argument I have and want no invovlement in?