Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think the song 'ten little indians' is inappropriate?

72 replies

melondrama · 19/05/2010 09:12

yesterday at my local church baby/toddler group the leader introduced this song at circle time and it seemed very wrong. especially as 1 regular mum and dd are indian and looked very confused.. I didn't sing along! I was thinking to have a word with the leader as she is a neighbour friend but am I over reacting?

OP posts:
cupcakesandbunting · 19/05/2010 17:16

We call them North American Natives now, you know? Not american indians.

Millenium · 19/05/2010 17:40

Too much "correctness". There is nothing wrong with using the word Indian in the song because NOWHERE in the song, is it used in a derogatory way. YABU IMO

StewieGriffinsMom · 19/05/2010 17:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

chibi · 19/05/2010 18:14

sgm like i said to people here first nations people are fictional history folk, like pixies

possibly almost as real as the na'vi

they aren't real, extant people who have preferences about what they are called, who can be offended by incorrect terms/stereotypes eg the woo woo woo crap

thus there can be no offensive terminology regarding them

i used to visibly flinch when i first came here and people asked me if there were many red indians where i was from

jesus do you have any idea what you SOUND like i would think

but again indian=fairy=elf etc so anything goes and you're the freak for objecting

chibi · 19/05/2010 18:16

having said that there is also that attitude in n america there are the cleveland indians (baseball?)whose fans do the tomahawk chop

StewieGriffinsMom · 19/05/2010 18:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

catinthehat2 · 19/05/2010 18:27

I don't like this "Jesus" word used as an expletive Chibi.

chibi · 19/05/2010 18:41

sorry cat

people here just don't think first nations people exist in a modern sense

they think they are historical artifacts, like cowboys perhaps

catinthehat2 · 19/05/2010 18:45
Smile
ScreaminEagle · 19/05/2010 18:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

runnybottom · 19/05/2010 18:56

since when were cowboys historical artefacts?

chibi · 19/05/2010 19:00

No you're right

I've completely invalidated my argument

carry on using whatever racial slurs you like

they aren't people, they are a fancy dress option

cupcakesandbunting · 19/05/2010 20:00

That song is so offensive to monkeys, ScreaminEagle.

Rosa · 19/05/2010 20:18

Humpty Dumpty is an offence to Chickens,
Mary Mary - quite contrary is an offence to anyone called Mary who is not contrary.
Ring Ring of Roses is an offence to anybody whose relations died in the plague.
The list is endless.
YABU

StewieGriffinsMom · 19/05/2010 20:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

LouIsOnAHighwayToHell · 19/05/2010 20:48

Ring a ring a roses is not actually to do with the plague. It is folk lore.

1.the late appearance of the explanation
2.the symptoms described do not fit especially well with the Great Plague
3.the great variety of forms makes it unlikely that the modern form is the most ancient one, and the words on which the interpretation are based are not found in many of the earliest records of the rhyme
4.European and 19th-century versions of the rhyme suggest that this "fall" was not a literal falling down, but a curtsy or other form of bending movement that was common in other dramatic singing games

So what about Little jack Horner - Is that not abuse making him sit int he corner.

Jack Sprat and his wife - Promoting anorexia and obesity?

MadamDeathstare · 19/05/2010 21:05

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

hogshead · 19/05/2010 21:46

i've got a version of this song on a childrens CD which uses the word `dinosaur' instead

paisleyleaf · 19/05/2010 21:55

TooPragmatic "paisley leaf, I dno't know of any First Nations people in Canada who would describe themselves as American Indians".
No, of course not. As they wouldn't describe themselves as Native American - I was responding to the previous post.

MillyR · 19/05/2010 22:03

Actually the term Indian is preferred by the majority of the native people of the United States. The name being used in North America has nothing to do with people of the subcontinent of India. The term 'Indian' was used in reference to people in North America first.

'American Indian' means an indigenous American.

'Indian American' means an American descended from people of the Indian sub-continent in Asia.

MillyR · 19/05/2010 22:04

Preferred to 'Native American' I mean. It isn't preferred to their tribal name, but is preferred when talking about all the tribal peoples of the United States.

StewieGriffinsMom · 19/05/2010 22:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread