I've just run accross this article on the BBC and I'm fuming.
I am four feet eleven tall. This is my natural healthy height. One of my five daughters is taller than I am, but the others may well end up my height. They are healthy and perfect.
The girl in the article needed human growth hormone - she wasn't naturally short. But the article totally ignores the existence of people who are genetically short. From the article it sounds like anyone under five foot four is in need of treatment!
It includes a picture where she is about 8 inches shorter than her friend. There is no way the girl is 5 foot tall in the first picture and five foot four in the second, yet according to the article that's the difference the growth hormone made. I'm so angry that the article implies she was bullied because she was abnormal, then when she became normal the bullying stopped.
A) Being five feet tall is not abnormal!
B) Bullying is not due to something wrong with the victim! The faulty person is the bully!
I was never bullied about my height and I wouldn't be even an inch taller if you paid me. I am spitting blood that this article implies my lovely daughters, if they don't grow taller than me, will be abnormal and justify bullying towards them.
AIBU?