Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this latest call for a ban on smoking in cars is another example of bossy nanny state

102 replies

5Foot5 · 24/03/2010 19:30

First let me say that I am a non-smoker; I have always been a non-smoker; I do not like being in a smoky atmosphere and I would not tolerate smoking in my house or my car.

But that is my house, my car and my choice.

Today's papers carry a story that "leading" doctors and the Chief Medical Officer want a ban on smoking in all cars because of a study showing the connection between passive smoking in children and asthma attacks.

Now I realise that asthma is a dangerous and distressing illness and I have sympathy for the sufferers and their families. But surely any parent of an asthmatic, if they have any common sense, would already be doing their utmost to ensure that the children live and travel in a smoke-free environment. If there are parents who are stupid and selfish enough to ignore the advice and continue to smoke around their asthmatic children, surely that is the problem to be addressed?

More could be done to help those children by targetting and educating the parents who are the problem, rather than penalising the population at large who want to indulge their vice in the privacy of their own car where they are harming noone but themselves. It seems madness to me that someone who is not an asthmatic, has no family members who are and who never gives a lift to anyone who is, should be prevented from smoking in their car and to suggest that this will somehow protect other childrens health.

Frankly I think this latest twist is just another attempt by the health fascists to stamp out a behaviour that they disapprove of. A ban on smoking in cars has been suggested before and not been carried forward. This latest attempt is cynically using the children's health angle because they see that as a more emotive issue that might win support where they failed before.

If this ban went through then I would not be personally affected in any way but it still makes me irritated that there are people who think it is their right to dictate to the rest of us what we should and shouldn't be doing for our own good.

Rant over!

OP posts:
BranflakeGirl · 25/03/2010 11:01

Pfth! Like they are ever going to police that!!! They don't even bother policing the ban on mobile phones whilst driving.

Personally, I would like to see a ban on smoking in all public places...streets, town centre's, shop and pub doorway's...to stop the stinking filth bags blowing smoke in peoples faces. In fact, I think they should ban smoking totally.

mayorquimby · 25/03/2010 11:48

"..it'd be a bad use of law to prosecute her for indulging in a perfectly legal drug habit, in a manner which harms no-one else.."

But Raven, only until one day, drops a ciggie between her legs, panics trying to get it whilst it's burning her legs, loses concentration and mows someone down and kills them??"

Well if that's the basis of the argument then radios need to be banned from cars (because they distract people to some degree hence most people not having it on when they first started learning or turning it down when they needed to concentrate especially) and more importantly children should be banned from cars.
How many times do you see parents turning to say something to a child in the back or reaching around to seperate a fight. Add to that how many people on this very site admitted to feeling more nervous about driving with their young children in the car at first? Surely these are all potential dangers to force a person to lose concentration.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread