this is borne of some frustration that my neighbour's ds, 4.3, still has hitting, hair pulling as his communication of choice when things are not going his way. It is not this per se that I object to, I genuinely believe that children develop at their own pace. However, I struggle with the apparently passive approach that is taken when it happens. I am also understanding of a "logical consequences" discursive approach rather than punishment; it is what I use myself. However, at dd's age, 4.3 I believe that the logical consequence of physically hurting another child is perhaps that they should be removed from the fun situation, even if temporarily. This is difficult as my neighbour believes that explaining to my dd what she did to cause the hit is appropriate logical consequence. Often this is, well ds doesn't want to play with dd any more so he hit her. If an apology is given, it is from my friend. We often end up leaving the play (in our street, not the child's home) because dd is upset and not wanting to be hit. I do believe that the child in question has communication difficulties, but in this situation, should the parent be diong more to move things towards a situation where her ds doesn't hit to get what he wants. The other day, my dd said in a loud voice "i don't want you to hit me ever again" I was very proud of her assertiveness, but didn't agree when my neighbour said that it's so much more powerful when children do it for themselves. Yes, absolutely, but they need to be supported in this by adults who also assert and support.
Bit of a rant, but essentially, to what degree should nature take its course in this situation? I'm thinking we could have a bit of a wait on our hands for him to learn the no hitting concept by himself!!